ellisson
Well-known
That would be the Q camera I and others have been hoping for. Per Leica Rumors.
So it doesn’t compete. The Leica CL nearly killed the rest of the M cameras and Leica doesn’t want a repeat. It’s still a very good focal length.Strange lens decision since they have so many good 35 and 50mm lenses. Why didnt they make it 35mm ? i suppose to sell more m lenses on the go.
My rumor has it at $6,800.Rumor says $6000+
Or an even $6,000 with a gently used kidney in trade.My rumor has it at $6,800.
I have tried it on pentax limited and its a very strange focal length. Nor 35 nor 50. If they dont want to have such problems maybe they could reduce the prices. The cl was of course cheaper than the m cameras and it did very well. There is a reason why 40mm, although small and cheap in almost any system, doesnt get much love. Id happily consider a full frame 35 or 50mm with autofocus and leica but with such a price its coming out, without interchangeable lenses one must be sure that his favorite focal length is that.So it doesn’t compete. The Leica CL nearly killed the rest of the M cameras and Leica doesn’t want a repeat. It’s still a very good focal length.
Strange lens decision since they have so many good 35 and 50mm lenses. Why didnt they make it 35mm ? i suppose to sell more m lenses on the go.
I have a feeling that the lens might be even longer than the 28/1.7.Pancake lenses tend to be 40mm or 43mm so I guess Leica chose it for the lower profile?
Lens doesn't exactly look small - far from a pancake. People on Reddit are slating the grey leatherette/wrap, but I think it looks pretty good.
The lens is bulky; I don't care. It suits the camera.It's already out in the wild:
View attachment 4845220
View attachment 4845221
Lens doesn't exactly look small - far from a pancake. People on Reddit are slating the grey leatherette/wrap, but I think it looks pretty good.