A tale of an old two-eyes

shadowfox

Darkroom printing lives
Local time
5:49 PM
Joined
Oct 24, 2006
Messages
8,770


Looks like my attempt to subtlety is lost :)
No one seem to realize that the image above is a link to my photo journal entry about the camera.
 
Last edited:
Thanks.
The highlight on the strap looks fine on my monitors.
But those are not calibrated monitors :)
 
That and even the area on the bottom of the camera looks a little blown out on my (also uncalibrated) monitor.

Nice of camera though. Do you use it?
 
This secondary monitor isn't 100% colour accurate but does fine for judging exposures on my photos, so I'll trust that.

Indeed, do you use the camera?
 
Don't do it. Don't cave into the notion that everything has to fit nicely into a histogram. No photographer is under any obligation to reveal all that is there, whether detail in the shadows or detail lost to highlights.

Your point is well taken. However, in my case I commented as I thought is was a distraction.
 
Will, your subtlety was lost on me until I read your edit and followed the link. Great camera and great photos. May slow photography (and slow food) never die.
Allan
 
Don't do it. Don't cave into the notion that everything has to fit nicely into a histogram. No photographer is under any obligation to reveal all that is there, whether detail in the shadows or detail lost to highlights.

Good point. The histogram is a tool and how we use the tool is not bound by the tool itself, rather with our vision.

too much letters for me now, but those dreamy images are quite awesome.

I'd be really interested to know more about "too much letter for me," I'm afraid something is lost in translation.

Will, your subtlety was lost on me until I read your edit and followed the link. Great camera and great photos. May slow photography (and slow food) never die.
Allan

Hear hear :)
 
Back
Top Bottom