A very interesting take on portraiture

Not my style but Very Well Done, Loved it !

Such a Charming little Girl who skillfully played each character
 
Holy Cow! Thanks John! A great link--very different, clever and well thought out. Pretty kid, too...not something many would have thought of...
Paul
 
Mmmh I dont' Know I don't get the point of this pictures...plus I found the idea of redoing paintings of the past quite silly...
 
Very novel. The detail work in the sets and wardrobe is impressive. His daughter is quite amazing for a five year old. Brilliant stuff.
 
I'm a bit conflicted. The model is a beautiful child and the photography is very well done. I'm certain a fair amount of work and creative thought went into each one. They seem to be extremely well done.

However, and there had to be a however, I feel uncomfortable with the relationship between the original masterpieces and the fauxtography.
 
Like the photorealist paintings of the 1970s except the other way round. Somehow they just don't hit the spot for me.
 
I'm with Simon, Sejanus.Aelianus et al. NOT "a very interesting take on portraiture"... twee and pointless.

Other photographers refer to art history with much more to say about the people they portray and our world.

Take Hendrik Kerstens, who photographed his daughter growing up http://www.danzigergallery.com/artists/hendrik-kerstens or Tom Hunter http://whitecube.com/exhibitions/tom_hunter_life_and_death_in_hackney_duke_street_2000/

And dare I say it me (though not portraits): http://www.richcutler.co.uk/photography/fast/

(Do read the descriptions on the above pages for context.)
 
Brilliantly executed and very funny. I really can't see why anyone would have a problem with the concept, either. Hard to believe he can do each one in 8 hours.

Cheers,

R.
 
. . . Other photographers refer to art history with much more to say about the people they portray and our world.

Take Hendrik Kerstens, who photographed his daughter growing up . .. .
MORE to say? Complete lack of playfulness: generic glum shots.

Cheers,

R.
 
I feel the same way.

+1

I'm a bit conflicted. The model is a beautiful child and the photography is very well done. I'm certain a fair amount of work and creative thought went into each one. They seem to be extremely well done.

However, and there had to be a however, I feel uncomfortable with the relationship between the original masterpieces and the fauxtography.

+2 exactly.
 
Back
Top Bottom