Whateverist
Well-known
I'm going to try a roll of this film, any recommendations with regards to shooting and developing?
Can I process this in DD-X, and if so, does anyone have recommendation regarding time?
Can I process this in DD-X, and if so, does anyone have recommendation regarding time?
kram
Well-known
Only used it in the Adox specified developer. From the results in contrasty lighting, I don't think I would use anything else, i.e. even this developer can only just cope with this film.
Whateverist
Well-known
Darn. Going into Terra Incognita then. How exciting.
vytasn
Established
Here is an article on developing CMS 20 with HC-110 stand development:
http://www.theonlinedarkroom.com/2015/05/adox-cms-20-stand-developed-in-hc110.html
I tried it once, results were pretty good but I got some bromide drag. Haven't had time to try it again.
http://www.theonlinedarkroom.com/2015/05/adox-cms-20-stand-developed-in-hc110.html
I tried it once, results were pretty good but I got some bromide drag. Haven't had time to try it again.
Whateverist
Well-known
Thanks for the link!
Pioneer
Veteran
I understand that it develops well in Diafine. http://davidshootsfilm.com/2012/11/05/adox-cms-20-i-in-adotech-i/
I haven't tested this yet but will certainly do so soon.
If you plan on using Adotech II then I recommend shooting at EI12. If you are going to try Diafine then I would start at EI25 since a lot of films do better in Diafine if they are underexposed about a stop. Just some starting points.
I haven't tested this yet but will certainly do so soon.
If you plan on using Adotech II then I recommend shooting at EI12. If you are going to try Diafine then I would start at EI25 since a lot of films do better in Diafine if they are underexposed about a stop. Just some starting points.
J enea
Established
i just shot and developed some of this film. used to adotech 2 developer and was shocked by how good the negs looked. i read, from people who know what they are talking about, to only use the adotech 2 developer with this film. I could not be happier with the results. followed the instructions that came with the developer and shot at EI of 16 developed in 300ml for 13 min.
Whateverist
Well-known
I did some experimenting this afternoon. One roll, heavily bracketed.
Developing this film was a colourful adventure. The pre-rinse looked like the Grinch had been sick in my sink. The post-wash went through the spectrum from beet over strawberry to salmon. The negatives have the most crystal-clear base I've yet come across.
The roll should be dry in about an hour. I think I have at least a few usable shots despite using the "wrong" developer and guesstimating dev times.
Developing this film was a colourful adventure. The pre-rinse looked like the Grinch had been sick in my sink. The post-wash went through the spectrum from beet over strawberry to salmon. The negatives have the most crystal-clear base I've yet come across.
The roll should be dry in about an hour. I think I have at least a few usable shots despite using the "wrong" developer and guesstimating dev times.
Whateverist
Well-known
DD-X 1:9 for 8.5 minutes.
Lessons learned: this film does not forgive metering mistakes. Probably need to go to 1:4. Negatives themselves are gorgeous in terms of detail.


Lessons learned: this film does not forgive metering mistakes. Probably need to go to 1:4. Negatives themselves are gorgeous in terms of detail.
jbielikowski
Jan Bielikowski
I managed to get decent results in Rodinal 1+300 12 mins and minimum agitation... But only with exposures spot on.
Hatchetman
Well-known
good stuff guys. Thanks for the examples. I am not paying $25 to develop a couple rolls of film when I could just move to 6x7 film.
tho60
Well-known
I managed to get decent results in Rodinal 1+300 12 mins and minimum agitation... But only with exposures spot on.
Very interesting. How about bromide drags?
Whateverist
Well-known

Not bad for a shot in a dark street. I think this was a 30s exposure. Sorry about the jaunty angle.
I decided to give stand development a try. DD-X 1:29 for two hours with one inversion every 30 minutes. It's not quite there yet, but since I wasn't expecting to get useable negatives, I'm pretty happy with this result.
ashfaque
Learning
I collected some references in search of an alternative to Adotech II. But due to work load I haven't been able to test it (yet). PM me your email address if you're interested.
Bests,
Ashfaque
Bests,
Ashfaque
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
Developing this film was a colourful adventure. The pre-rinse looked like the Grinch had been sick in my sink. The post-wash went through the spectrum from beet over strawberry to salmon.
So if you don't end up liking the film you can start a career writing food and cooking articles.
fer_fdi
Well-known
any advice when taking this film to a lab for developing?
it is better to suggest developers, times, etc?
it is better to suggest developers, times, etc?
fer_fdi
Well-known
I exposed first roll at ISO 50 by accident (my intention was to use it at ISO 12)
Since I have no experience developing and found a very good B&W lab locally,
I decided to buy a small 8€ Adotech III bottle for them to process it.
Most of the shots survived gracefully, they did a great job.
I will expose next rolls at ISO 6 and 12 and ask them to use Adotech III again.
Then I might adventure to develop one at home in Caffenol
55 Jupiter-8 @5.6 on "ADOX CMS 20 II" shot at ISO 50. CLE :
Since I have no experience developing and found a very good B&W lab locally,
I decided to buy a small 8€ Adotech III bottle for them to process it.
Most of the shots survived gracefully, they did a great job.
I will expose next rolls at ISO 6 and 12 and ask them to use Adotech III again.
Then I might adventure to develop one at home in Caffenol
55 Jupiter-8 @5.6 on "ADOX CMS 20 II" shot at ISO 50. CLE :

Pioneer
Veteran
I love this film and will try it with other developers. But I do have to say, Adotech II worked very well and I hear that Adotech III is even better.
The price of developing, etc. is a personal decision and most will have to decide what cost level they are comfortable with. TriX still sells for around $5 per roll and a bag of D-76 to mix up a gallon of developer is only $7 then additional costs for other film types may be hard to justify.
The price of developing, etc. is a personal decision and most will have to decide what cost level they are comfortable with. TriX still sells for around $5 per roll and a bag of D-76 to mix up a gallon of developer is only $7 then additional costs for other film types may be hard to justify.
sepiareverb
genius and moron
Just got in some of this in with the adotech 3. Will likely be a few weeks before I get to play with it, but looking forward to it.
Nokton48
Veteran
I have 500 sheets of this stuff in 6x9cm cut film.
So I'm very interested in posted results.
Keep them coming!
So I'm very interested in posted results.
Keep them coming!
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.