The plot thickens:
I took the camera to Essex Camera today for an estimate. The news wasn't good. $250.00 for fabricating some new RF parts (seems to be missing a tube or pipe of some kind), a new rack and lens cleaning (fungus!). So, I figured this wouldn't be fair to me or the seller, what with the repair costing nearly what the camera cost. So, I e-mailed the seller and suggested that I'd return the camera.
Unbelievably, he wrote back to me saying that I should keep the camera AND the money. This makes me uncomfortable. Not fair to him. He said he was out of 4x5 for good, thought the camera would be in a better home with me and felt bad for my inconvenience. Personally, I feel terrible for both us and am inclined to return the camera to him. I'm curious what others think. Of course, an essentially free camera is appealing to some of us, but it leaves my conscience feeling kind of lousy. I will probably write him back and insist that he reconsider. He's been too decent so far, as many of you have agreed given the average level of integrity on eBay. Am I nuts? Is he nuts? I think he should have the camera and I should have my money, but neither us should be left empty-handed. Opinions on this??? I also think he should receive some kind of award for his fairness and good nature. A televised award with a big statue or trophy (maybe like the one that the Spanish soccer player dropped yesterday, but not one that was run over by a bus).