An Optimistic View On The Future Of Traditional Photo Genres

R

ruben

Guest
You may be feeling me too much writing at RFF after several months of quiet shooting. I must reveal that besides my renewed interest, I am grounded at home due to a small surgery that keeps me in. So I am having a lot of free fime for TV, and I would like to comment about a recent made movie that ligthened some spark in my mind: Appaloosa.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0800308/

In the short pre TV always chastrating description of the film it was written (You judge how much these descriptions can be circumsitive -invented just now by me out of the word "circumcision") That it brought a cheap short resume blah, blah ... and played by Viggo Mortensen and Rene Zellweger.

They omitted the most important actor and director there: Ed Harris. Not to speak about the omission of Jeremy Irons. Ok here is just Israel, the country where people do not know to form a line up while waiting for a bus.

However, since I am always curious about performances by Rene Zellweger, I went to look the film, despite it was announced too it is a Western one.

Another spaghetti western ? Who in hell has the strength, not just to view, but to even make another Western. Is anything new after Kid & Cassidy, Charles Bronson, and Clint Eastwood and the Ugly too ?

So it was only my interest in Ms Zellweger sweetness that prompted me to indulge in another macho Western film. But What A Surprise I Got !!!!

True, it is not a crushing generetion landmark, but the silly story is portrayed so well, the athmosphere, the tension, the acting, the pernoalities build up - so good, that is seems not only Ed Harris has opened a new path as film director and actor of fine movies, like Clint Eastwood - but the main thing is that at some point you do find yourself you are seeing another Western, but with such a master touch that it becomes a real delight, and I will include it in the films I hope one day I will be able to see again in a real cinema, paying money for a second view.

Therefore, if in the cinema Art field, nothing is completely dead but always depends on how it is done, isn't this fact telling us something about traditional photographic genres, like Street Photography or/and The Human Condition, that our own tiredness lead us some times to feel they are passe and no one is giving a damn for them but only those involved in?

Don't worry in a few days I am supposed to be out, and less pressing here.
:)
Cheers,
Ruben
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Interesting review. Now I want to see it too. Which is good I suppose, since generally I am not fond of modern western movies. Give me John Wayne anytime! :D Of course, it would be hard to turn down seeing Ms Zellweger too.

Thanks for the heads up and hope you heal well and quickly.
 
Best wishes and a speedy recovery. Your review makes me want to rush out and rent the movie, which I probably otherwise would not have done. Thanks.
 
Normally, I don't go for Westerns but this was indeed a good movie...I have seen it several times and would watch it again...Ed Harris is an under-rated actor who should do more...I do enjoy his work!!!
Not the biggest fan of Ms. Zellweger...I haven't seen her in anything that really wowed me...
Now back to Ed Harris...If you get the chance watch "Enemy at the Gates"...and as an added bonus you get Rachel Weisz...

Get Well...Shalom...
 
Last edited:
Right on nikon sam...

on all three counts: both actors and the movie.

(although it still pains me to refer to a lady as an 'actor.')

PS: Get well Ruben.
 
Back
Top Bottom