Annie Liebovitz Exhibition

Leigh Youdale

Well-known
Local time
9:59 AM
Joined
Apr 27, 2007
Messages
1,621
Location
Sydney, Australia
There's currently an "International" Annie Liebovitz exhibition at the Sydney Museum of Contemporary Art which I attended on Sunday. I have to say it was a disappointment.

Certainly there was a representative showing of some of her large iconic celebrity portraits with which we're all familiar - too familiar perhaps. But a large proportion of the exhibit was comprised of small (about 5x4) mono prints of her family members. They were quite without merit and the sort of thing that almost anyone could produce from their family snapshot album. Nothing about them indicated that we were looking at work supposed to be representative of a major photographic artist. They were just plain ordinary.
Another major part of the exhibit were series of small photographs of Susan Sontag, especially depicting her slow death from cancer. Highly personal to Sontag and Liebovitz, perhaps, but not very appropriate to a public in Australia.
Her few landscapes were poor and would have been better left out of the show.

Whether the content of the exhibition reflects the fact that Liebovitz has lost control of most of her images after selling the rights to them to pay off her debts, I don't know.

The whole exhibition was self indulgent and second rate in my view. The $15 I paid was not worth it. Had she not had the good fortune to get access to celebrities through the magazines she was commissioned by and given the budgets to create the setups she used she would not have become famous at all. She must have talked a good game!

In contrast, at the NSW State Library it was the last day of a major exhibition of an Australian photographer's work, Jeff Carter, who took to the back roads in 1946 and spent much of his life photographing the battlers in our rural areas. Not unlike the Farm Administration photographs of earlier years in the USA. This exhibition was a retrospective (Jeff died last year) was free and of much greater interest and content.
 
I think you have to put Liebovitz's work in the context of the time she was making her "iconic" images. Whatever characateur of herself she has become, Liebovitz was an incredibly hard working, extremely creative photographer in the heady, early Rolling Stone days. It's too bad the gallery show took away from that by also displaying work not up to the quality of her earlier work.
 
....she may have been creative in the heady, earling Rolling Stones days but she has become a product of her subject matter ie. she is more of a celebrity than the people she photographs.
...the exhibition was awful..those landscapes of Monument Valley were very poor! The exhibition also showed the pressure on magazine photographers to produce the next great front cover shot, with evidence of her using similar portrait poses across various images...started to look a little formulaic...
.....though still slightly better than my photographs 😉
 
Last edited:
I went to the exhibition when I was down in Sydney back in November and interestingly, I had the complete opposite opinion. As many would only associate her with her celebrity portraits, a wide showcase of her work, from landscapes, early photographs and her most famous photographs gave viewers a deeper insight into Annie Liebovitz. Those small 4x5 prints were the highlight for me, showing her most personal and introspective work, which we so rarely see from Liebovitz.
 
However good she may or may not be I was put off her totally many years ago while watching a doco about her. She was doing a shoot for Vanity Fair and my lasting impression was of a melodramatic impatient pain in the arse who treated her underlings atrociously.
 
i quiet enjoyed the huge, grainy landscape images. they where my favourite part... go figure?

amongst all of the photos i have seen over, and over, and over i found them refreshing in that they where so devoid of subject matter and 'technical excellence' in contrast to everything else in the exhibition.
 
I judge people largely by how they treat their fellow man ... in the documentary film I saw she unsulted and belittled those around her as she saw fit.

Hey, for all I know Gary Winogrand may have tortured small mammals in his spare time ... but because I have no knowledge of this I like him and his photos.

In my world ... human being first, artist second!
 
I am with those who loved the exhibition...

I am with those who loved the exhibition...

Its title was a life in photography, or something like that and what it showed for me was the full range of ways in which photography was part of her life and how it all fitted together - the magazine work, celebrity portraits, family snaps, record of her relationship with Susan Sontag and of Susan's death. I would be wonderful to read a critique of the exhibition by Susan, who wrote so well about photography - alas, never to be.

I thought some of the small photographs showed good compositional skills, but also, the fact that "anyone could do them" told us something about photography itself that prefigured what is happening to it now with the ubiquity of digital imaging. And the landscapes, although not wholly successful, showed that she was willing to try something new. I also enjoyed the insight into the process of making the exhibition, with the wall of pinned up pages from magazines.

I also enjoyed the Jeff Carter exhibition. They aren't in competition.
 
Different Folks, Different Strokes

Different Folks, Different Strokes

I went to the exhibition when I was down in Sydney back in November and interestingly, I had the complete opposite opinion. As many would only associate her with her celebrity portraits, a wide showcase of her work, from landscapes, early photographs and her most famous photographs gave viewers a deeper insight into Annie Liebovitz. Those small 4x5 prints were the highlight for me, showing her most personal and introspective work, which we so rarely see from Liebovitz.

I went expecting to see a collection of the work of outstanding quality that made her famous. There was some of that there. I didn't go to get any insights into her "most personal and introspective work" which I thought was second rate and which detracted from the exhibition as a whole. But then I'm not at all interested in Annie Leibovitz as a person, or her family or friends. That isn't what she's noted for (unless it's her relationship with Sontag).
A dedicated exhibition on Susan Sontag would make sense as a stand-alone event but it's not something I'd be interested in going to anyway.

My overall impression (of the exhibition) is that she's had to sell off so much to pay her debts that they were dredging the bottom of the bucket for whatever she has left and trying to dress up what they found there and make it sound like an important photographic event. Sorry, but apart from the quite impressive studio portraits of the celebs, it didn't impress me at all. About half of the landscapes I wouldn't have even bothered printing if they were mine. Printing them to cover the whole wall didn't make them any better.
 
Some interesting comments. For me, it was the best exhibition I have seen in my life. I frankly don't care what Annie is like as a person; I love her work. I thought the staging for the exhibition was first class too.
 
The whole exhibition was self indulgent and second rate in my view. The $15 I paid was not worth it. Had she not had the good fortune to get access to celebrities through the magazines she was commissioned by and given the budgets to create the setups she used she would not have become famous at all. She must have talked a good game!

I'm not much of a fan of Leibowitz, I wouldn't be going to a show of hers. Not my thing. However, what you wrote here is just a cheap shot, nobody gets to the top of the heap in NY just on talk and luck. Wandering around making landscapes in the boonies is a cakewalk by comparison.
 
Last edited:
Well, maybe some do, but I don't think that's true of Leibowitz. She produced some good work in a very high pressure environment. Few photographers can do that as well as she has. As I said, her work is not my thing, but I do think she's earned some respect.
 
Well, maybe some do, but I don't think that's true of Leibowitz. She produced some good work in a very high pressure environment. Few photographers can do that as well as she has. As I said, her work is not my thing, but I do think she's earned some respect.

I agree. It was the content of the exhibition that disappointed me, and (for me) parts of it detracted from her reputation.
 
You can't toss a roll of Tri-X through an Internet photo forum without hitting a comment about overrated famous photographers. I'm sure if the forum scribes would deign to photograph celebrities or write artspeak they'd be making big $$$ in the photography game.
 
Back
Top Bottom