Ansel Adams

I think Ansel, like most of us, got to the point where he didn't want to carry around an 8x10 view camera....

One of my favorite photo forum moments:

You see it with professionals PJs ... you'll see shots of people who meet Magnum photographers at events or book signings or something and invevitably those photographers will be carrying a small Point and Shoot (digital or film)

You kind of are taken by suprise because you associate that person with a certain brand or type of camera...

Then there will also be the obligatory thread on some forum entitled "Magnum Photog, So and so uses a fujinikcanontax PS34-1? "

Those forum moments tickle my funny bone to no end 😀

Yes this type of work from Ansel is very desirable and just shows his skills as a photographer in general 🙂
 
I'm pretty sure I recall Adams writing about using a Contax. Early on any 35mm work he did would have been with an RF, since SLRs were in their infancy at best.

Adams always used the tools that were best for the job. We associate him with view cameras for his landscape and architectural work, but he also used Hasselblad and 35mm for reportage and corporate work.
 
If you click on the neg scans at the bottom, you can see many were still large format since you still see the shape of the film holder.

At the Ansel Adams exhibit currently in Toronto's AGO, there's at least 1 35mm shot, and it's blown up rather big too.
 
I tend to disagree that these are particularly interesting, aside from the subject matter. If you look at the really good people shooters with the FSA, I think you'll find more **photographically** interesting shots than anything Adams made at the internment camp (although Adams was probably right about one thing: they're an important historical document.) I've also seen, from time to time, efforts to sell Adams' color work. Those efforts also tend to be somewhat unsuccessful, because, honestly, I don't think he did that well with color. His best B&W landscape work, though, seems almost untouchable. He has a quote about being in a place when God wanted a photograph taken, and that's about it. You have to be there when God wants you to be, ready to take a picture. There are many, many really terrific landscape artists who go out and take perfectly exposed shots that are brilliantly printed, but God didn't care about that particular shot, so it looks like something on a General Mills calendar. Even Adams didn't score that often -- from his whole career, he has maybe a dozen widely acclaimed master works, and that must be from tens of thousands of shots...IMHO, they don't include the internment photos.

JC
 
Of all ungodly things, AA was reputed to have done some work with (excuse) Polaroids in his later years. He was also reported to be doing work with Hasselblads. I dare say it's true that he eventually tired of carrying 8x10s around.

There is one point, though: Since he did a lot of work with contact printing, he hardly would have done that with 35mm, even a Contax/Sonnar.

As mentioned up above, maybe we jump too soon to associating people with certain kinds/types of cameras and equipment. Adams surely used more than exlusively 8x10s, just as a certain famous Frenchman surely used more than just Leicas.
 
dll927 said:
... Adams surely used more than exlusively 8x10s...
People tend to forget this if they haven't read his writings (e.g. The Camera, The Negative, The Print, Polaroid Land Photography, Singular Images, AA: The Autobiograpy.) Adams was quite open about the breadth of equipment he used. He wasn't stuck in some bygone era, he was very active in testing and experimenting with new photographic materials and equipment. Polaroid is one example -- a God-given technology that was divinely inspired for development by a visionary inventor and then tested by some very notable photographers, including Adams. Oh, sorry, I guess I'm biased... one of my relatives worked closely with Edwin Land and to this day attests to his kindness, generousity and genius.
 
Back
Top Bottom