back alley
IMAGES
...who have difficulty calling themselves an artist?
The term "artist" doesn't bother me at all. When the term "pro" comes before photographer, I get a bad taste in my mouth.
Some are rubbish photographers, and have the guts to call it art, make huge prints, then make a huge fortune. It's a weird one.
Does it matter? I take photographs, I'm a photographer. If someone else wants to call me an artist, that's fine, but calling myself an artist seems a bit pointless. I've met many painters, sculptors, etc., who feel the same: they're more likely to say "I'm a painter (or whatever)" than "I'm an artist," which doesn't really tell you anything.
Also, I've met far too many people who press their wrists to their foreheads, literally or figuratively, and exclaim, "I am an Artist!" (you can hear the capital 'A') when they mean "I can't be bothered to learn anything technical" or "I am incapable of earning a living" or "Your petty concerns are beneath me." I'd prefer not to be lumped in with them.
Cheers,
R.
I like to say that photography can be an artistic pursuit, but it's hardly ever art. We judge each photos in different ways, some of our views and ideas are related to art, some technical, emotional, historical. Isn't that why it's a great thing to do and discuss, because it can be everything, or nothing, it's a brilliant thing. I love it.