I jut noticed this today from a photo I took over the weekend.
Photo 3 of 9
Children's Mass
Apr 22, 2007
934×639 pixels – 359KB
Filename: Mass4.jpg
Camera: Leica Camera AG
Model: M8 Digital Camera
ISO: 320
Exposure: 1/180 sec
Aperture: f/2.560852
Focal Length: 90mm
Photo 3 of 9
Children's Mass
Apr 22, 2007
934×639 pixels – 359KB
Filename: Mass4.jpg
Camera: Leica Camera AG
Model: M8 Digital Camera
ISO: 320
Exposure: 1/180 sec
Aperture: f/2.560852
Focal Length: 90mm
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
No- the M8 lists no aperture used. The aperture as determined by the camera is deemed to be too inaccurate to be used for EXIF.
This one is from the 24.
Filename: Mass8.jpg
Camera: Leica Camera AG
Model: M8 Digital Camera
ISO: 320
Exposure: 1/45 sec
Aperture: f/6.961117
Focal Length: 24mm
Filename: Mass8.jpg
Camera: Leica Camera AG
Model: M8 Digital Camera
ISO: 320
Exposure: 1/45 sec
Aperture: f/6.961117
Focal Length: 24mm
dazedgonebye
Veteran
Just curious...
Is the aperture listed a calculation based on shutter speed and "correct" exposure?
Is the aperture listed a calculation based on shutter speed and "correct" exposure?
scho
Well-known
I never shoot jpegs so I've not seen aperture reported in exif data for DNG files. Which firmware were you using?solaris10 said:This one is from the 24.
Filename: Mass8.jpg
Camera: Leica Camera AG
Model: M8 Digital Camera
ISO: 320
Exposure: 1/45 sec
Aperture: f/6.961117
Focal Length: 24mm
I shoot all in DNG and convert to JPG for web posting. Using the latest firmware downloaded a week or so ago.
Nemo
Established
What software do you use?
JeremyR
Photography Geek
dazedgonebye said:Just curious...
Is the aperture listed a calculation based on shutter speed and "correct" exposure?
How could the camera possibly know the "correct" exposure? Unless it has an additional, non-TTL meter, it cannot "see" the actual EV of a scene; it can only see what light is passed through an aperture of unknown size.
Cheers,
Jeremy
rvaubel
Well-known
JeremyR said:How could the camera possibly know the "correct" exposure? Unless it has an additional, non-TTL meter, it cannot "see" the actual EV of a scene; it can only see what light is passed through an aperture of unknown size.
Cheers,
Jeremy
But it does have an additional non-TTL meter. It's in the "blue dot". The camera has to be able to figure the approximate aperture in order to implement the vignetting and cyan correction in the software. Leica could report this F number in the EXIF data if they wanted to. I sure wish they would.
Rex
JeremyR
Photography Geek
rvaubel said:But it does have an additional non-TTL meter. It's in the "blue dot". The camera has to be able to figure the approximate aperture in order to implement the vignetting and cyan correction in the software.
Indeed it does. If Leica engineers are able to relatively accurately estimate the lens aperture using such a device to measure EV (especially considering the varying angle of view of different lenses), then color me impressed!
Cheers,
Jeremy
robg
Member
Any disparity is likely due to the fact that the blue dot has a far wider FOV than most lenses. It is like the different between spot and ambient metering. It is a shame there is no EV EXIF field (or is there?)
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.