Anyone using a Ultron 28/1.9 day to day with an R-D1?

[kshapero]

Anyone using a Ultron 28/1.9 day to day with an R-D1? Or any other 28mm lens?

 

[LCT]

No Ultron sorry. Just Summicron-M 28/2, Elmarit-M 28/2.8 asph and M-Rokkor 28/2.8.

 

[Leica0Series]

Avenon 28 f/3.5. Dinky little lens.

 

[yanidel]

I got one. Nice for B&W pictures most of all due to low contrast. Easy to use as the full finder area is a better match then the framelines to the actual picture size. IMO, a little bit soft wide at 2 and 2.8, don't know if this is my sample.
I use it mainly as my low light wide angle when I need 2.0. During daylight, I prefer the CV21 or 35 PII. Much smaller and lighter.
All in all, I have not experienced that much with it because, as said, I find it a bit too bulky for a normal day of shooting.

 

[Burkey]

I really like the 28 Ultron and it does serve as my "normal" lens on my RD-1. A bit bulky but compared to some of the "four-thirds" lenses I have it's just fine.
Skopar 21 with external viewfinder makes a great walk around lens too.

 

[kshapero]

I really like the 28 Ultron and it does serve as my "normal" lens on my RD-1. A bit bulky but compared to some of the "four-thirds" lenses I have it's just fine.
Skopar 21 with external viewfinder makes a great walk around lens too.

What external VF do you use for the 21mm?

 

[Burkey]

The 21D Voigtlander finder. 'Got it from Stephen. Very bright and pretty accurate framing. A nice "walk-around" system.

 

[kshapero]

The 21D Voigtlander finder. 'Got it from Stephen. Very bright and pretty accurate framing. A nice "walk-around" system.

Is that a different VF than the one that came with it?

 

[yanidel]

Is that a different VF than the one that came with it?

Yes, it takes into account the crop factor of 1.53. The one that came with the 21mm lens can be used with the 15mm on the RD1.

 

[Burkey]

I opted for the "P" version of the Skopar so no free finder. It would have been nice because I still have a Bessa T. The "D" finder with the Skopar has worked well for me with RD-1. The Ultron 28 still remains a favorite of mine.

 

[kshapero]

New related question?

New related question?

New question: is anyone using a Zeiss ZM 28/2.8 day to day?

 

[noimmunity]

35 best option on RD-1, IMHO

35 best option on RD-1, IMHO

I could almost answer yes, except that I don't use the RD-1 day-to-day, hahaha! But the ZM 28/2.8 and the RD-1 make a very, very nice combo, indeed! In fact, I compared and preferred it to the CV 28/1.9 and 28/3.5, though it's a tradeoff anyway you choose.

A note on personal preference: On RF cameras with integral VF/RF, I prefer the framelines that give more peripheral "outside-the-frame" view, without being too small. On a camera like the Zeiss Ikon, that means the 35 and 50. On the Rd-1, that means especially the 35. For me, the RD-1 works best with a 35 lens. There are a lot of great 35s to choose from, including the 35 Ultron you already have, but I've settled on ZM lenses. I think I'll really like the new C Biogon! Since you already have the 35 Ultron but still want to move to a 28, I guess that you are really set on using the 28 framelines! But maybe after usage you will come back to a 35?!

More food for thought: When I go wider, I usually step down to a 25 rather than the 28. The 28 lines are usually so crammed anyway that using the whole VF for a 25 just isn't that much of a sacrifice. My choice is finally determined by what I want from my other body (I almost always use the RD-1 in combo with a film body), and in theory I switch lenses between the two. So a 25 and 50 works well, giving me FLs of 25, 37, 50 and 75. Given the lenses you already have, I'll make the bold slightly OT suggestion of going for a Zeiss 25 Biogon. It would make a nice step between the 35 and the 21 you already have, and would work well on both film and digital bodies.

 

[sebastel]

i used to use the 28mm ultron as my "daily lens" for a while, until good fate gave me a 25mm biogon. i quickly found out that i do not need both, and sold the ultron.

both are about the same size - and that would be the only reason for me to wish for the 28mm biogon instead. beside that, the 25mm biogon works very well on the R-D1, and even it's size is not really an issue.

the biogon 2.0/35mm is a very nice choice, too, but on R-D1 i actually prefer the 25mm.


cheers,
sebastian

 

[__hh]

I use the Biogon ZM 28mm f/2.8

I use the Biogon ZM 28mm f/2.8

New question: is anyone using a Zeiss ZM 28/2.8 day to day?

I use it as my normal lens on the R-d1s.... indoors, I usually 'crank' it up to ISO 800... the f/2.8 is OK, but would love for it to be an f/2 🙂

 

[furcafe]

I used the 28/1.9 Ultron on my R-D1 regularly, until the R-D1 was relegated to backup for the M8 & I got the 28/2 Summicron ASPH from Leica as part of the initial user/tester lens discount. Never had a problem w/the Ultron, though it is low in contrast wide-open (same goes to some extent w/the Summicron, which is not as contrasty wide-open as the 35/2 Summicron ASPH or 35/1.4 Summilux ASPH). It's definitely a great bargain compared to the Summicron.

 

[noimmunity]

The summicron 28 is a prize lens.

Here's a photo taken today with the Biogon 28

 

[georgef]

I really like the 28 Ultron and it does serve as my "normal" lens on my RD-1. A bit bulky but compared to some of the "four-thirds" lenses I have it's just fine.
Skopar 21 with external viewfinder makes a great walk around lens too.

ditto, exactly!🙂

 

[kshapero]

I could almost answer yes, except that I don't use the RD-1 day-to-day, hahaha! But the ZM 28/2.8 and the RD-1 make a very, very nice combo, indeed! In fact, I compared and preferred it to the CV 28/1.9 and 28/3.5, though it's a tradeoff anyway you choose.

A note on personal preference: On RF cameras with integral VF/RF, I prefer the framelines that give more peripheral "outside-the-frame" view, without being too small. On a camera like the Zeiss Ikon, that means the 35 and 50. On the Rd-1, that means especially the 35. For me, the RD-1 works best with a 35 lens. There are a lot of great 35s to choose from, including the 35 Ultron you already have, but I've settled on ZM lenses. I think I'll really like the new C Biogon! Since you already have the 35 Ultron but still want to move to a 28, I guess that you are really set on using the 28 framelines! But maybe after usage you will come back to a 35?!

More food for thought: When I go wider, I usually step down to a 25 rather than the 28. The 28 lines are usually so crammed anyway that using the whole VF for a 25 just isn't that much of a sacrifice. My choice is finally determined by what I want from my other body (I almost always use the RD-1 in combo with a film body), and in theory I switch lenses between the two. So a 25 and 50 works well, giving me FLs of 25, 37, 50 and 75. Given the lenses you already have, I'll make the bold slightly OT suggestion of going for a Zeiss 25 Biogon. It would make a nice step between the 35 and the 21 you already have, and would work well on both film and digital bodies.

Good stuff and food for thought.