Back to Microdol-X

Tom hicks

Well-known
Local time
11:33 AM
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Messages
957
Location
Dallas Texas
As some of you know I developed my first B&W in Microdol -x a couple of weeks ago . I did 4 rolls . Three Tmax one Tri-x . I then tried 4 rolls of Tri x in D76. the result for me was Ok but I am favoring the tones of Microdol as well as the finer grain . I bought the last 4 bags that a local supplier had and tried it again today here is the results . I know of a few others that use it but the vast majority seem the use either D76 , Rodinal, or HC110, am I missing something that is not apparent to my being so new to the game ?

Here are my results from today, as usual my subject matter sucks ,but it is a test roll.
 

Attachments

  • F5 Tmax 400 Micro x 8.jpg
    F5 Tmax 400 Micro x 8.jpg
    38.6 KB · Views: 0
  • F5 Tmax 400 Micro x 9.jpg
    F5 Tmax 400 Micro x 9.jpg
    31.1 KB · Views: 0
  • F5 Tmax 400 Micro x 10.jpg
    F5 Tmax 400 Micro x 10.jpg
    42.5 KB · Views: 0
Three more for the heck of it.
 

Attachments

  • F5 Tmax 400 Micro x 13.jpg
    F5 Tmax 400 Micro x 13.jpg
    29.8 KB · Views: 0
  • F5 Tmax 400 Micro x 1.jpg
    F5 Tmax 400 Micro x 1.jpg
    51.4 KB · Views: 0
  • F5 Tmax 400 Micro x 16.jpg
    F5 Tmax 400 Micro x 16.jpg
    34.3 KB · Views: 0
film.jpg


i like microdol-x for its creaminess. i had problems with my last pack because i did not strain the developer enough which resulted in a lot of undissolved bits on the screen.

the above picture was something i found along the way.

raytoei
 
The Ilford Perceptol is about identical to Microdol-X and still available. Some will complain that Microdol-X leads to unsharp negatives, and to some extent this is true, but in prints up to 11x14 this is not an issue in my experience. Tonality is delightful in Perceptol/Microdol-X, my favorite developer for the dwindling supply of Plus-X in my freezer.
 
Microdol-X Rocks! although, you must now buy it as "Legacy" from Freestyle Photo. It's still around, Tom those are great! Keep going with it.
 
You can get an alternative:
http://freestylephoto.biz/749710-LegacyPro-Mic-X-Film-Developer-to-Make-1-Gallon

I always figured people didn't use it as much as other developers because of the speed loss. Even diluted I could never get proper shadow detail at more than EI 200 with Tri-X. This matters less in flat light or where shadow contrast doesn't matter much. It was offered at one lab I worked at and I had one client who used it with Plus-X at EI64 almost exclusively.

Marty
 
Microdol-X Rocks! although, you must now buy it as "Legacy" from Freestyle Photo. It's still around, Tom those are great! Keep going with it.

Hey Dan, As you know I'm not unhappy with it at all and will continue to use it . I feel comfortable with it although it's been a short learning time for me .

Hope all is well.

Tom
 
For a tad more increased sharpness but still with more or less the same excellent gradations, use Microdol-X or Perceptol diluted 1:1.. As long as ISO 320 not exceeded you retain the original creamyness. Starting with the HP4 and then with the HP5, I used this developer for long years.
 
The Ilford Perceptol is about identical to Microdol-X and still available. Some will complain that Microdol-X leads to unsharp negatives, and to some extent this is true, but in prints up to 11x14 this is not an issue in my experience. Tonality is delightful in Perceptol/Microdol-X, my favorite developer for the dwindling supply of Plus-X in my freezer.

thanks for the info , what little I has used Microdol I have not had any sharpness issues they are quite sharp and print wonderfully. I'm liking it .
 
People who complain about the Microdol sharpness, are picking their developer by looking through a grain loupe under the enlarger, or have read something previously, and are recalling it from memory. What they are missing out on, in my opinion, is the absolutely lovely tonality in the final prints.
 
Last edited:
Good info guys.
I wonder what it would look like when you use Microdol-X with Adox 25 or 50 ISO films.
Those film already have a smooth tonality look to begin with.
 
Good info guys.
I wonder what it would look like when you use Microdol-X with Adox 25 or 50 ISO films.
Those film already have a smooth tonality look to begin with.

Hello Shadowfox,

Here's something from digital truth on that combo:

http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php?Film=Efke+25&Developer=Microdol-X&mdc=Search

I never dilute Microdol-X, myself, because I always replenish it when I've finished my film run. And it lasts an incredibly long time, I've had a gallon going before for over a year before, and it gets better with time, as it is "seasoned" with the replenisher.
 
film.jpg


i like microdol-x for its creaminess. i had problems with my last pack because i did not strain the developer enough which resulted in a lot of undissolved bits on the screen.

the above picture was something i found along the way.

raytoei

I've never used Microdol-X, but I also like the creaminess of HC-110, especially with Tmax films. I have to say I've always been puzzled by this chart. As I remember there was zero discussion of EI used. Therefore I'm not sure if the shadow detail parameter is significant. They say at rated speed, but most people that read this chart will pick their own speed.
 
Last edited:
Recently I ran eight rolls of Eastman 5222 in straight Microdol-X, 15C for 24 minutes. Tonality was what I was expecting, absolutely lovely. Decent emulsion speed, too.
Now I have seven rolls of Neopan 400, and a roll of Double-X to run next, I will continue with this combo. I replenish my Micrdol-X, added 240cc for the first eight rolls. Looking forward to what this will do for me.

Microdol-X is a recommended developer (by Fuji) for Neopan 400 and 1600. I have alot of both of these to use up.
 
I used to use Microdol-X exclusively, some 40 years ago. How do you replenish the LegacyPro product? I seem to remember that I bought Microdol-X in liquid form and had a separate product to replenish. Am I correct or just forgetting what was available?
 
Back
Top Bottom