John Bragg
Well-known
It has been far too long since I posted anything on this forum but I am back with renewed enthusiasm having taken delivery of a brand new Plustek 7400 scanner and I am very impressed with its performance so far. For now my beloved Kaiser enlarger remains mothballed but I am hoping to make more regular contributions as i have really missed this. Here are my first attempts at scanning.
Tri-x in Rodinal
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7067/7026304367_96148ef298_z.jpg
Neopan 400 in Rodinal
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7273/7026251833_9078c809f5_z.jpg
Tri-x in Rodinal
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7067/7026304367_96148ef298_z.jpg
Neopan 400 in Rodinal
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7273/7026251833_9078c809f5_z.jpg
J. Borger
Well-known
I would not be happy with those scans. The tonal range is clipped and there is a colorcast in picture 1 assuming it is supposed to be a B&W picture.
The Plustek with Silverfast or Vuescan is almost a guarantee for overexposed, too contrasty and noisy scans with blown highlights.
I settled for scanning the files as POSITIVES with Silverfast with all scanneroptions set to OFF and do the conversion and further processing in photoshop. I Get much better results that way!! Give it a try.
The Plustek with Silverfast or Vuescan is almost a guarantee for overexposed, too contrasty and noisy scans with blown highlights.
I settled for scanning the files as POSITIVES with Silverfast with all scanneroptions set to OFF and do the conversion and further processing in photoshop. I Get much better results that way!! Give it a try.
John Bragg
Well-known
Thanks for commenting. As a starting point I think they look ok on my monitor and that is the key. They are just that. A baseline and somewhere to start the journey from and not the result of fine tuning and tweeking or anything like the final journeys end.
david.elliott
Well-known
I quite like the first photograph.
John Bragg
Well-known
Thanks David. It was taken in extremely contrasty lighting and against the light. it was scanned in colour but perhaps grey scale would work better ? I am on a learning curve after nearly 30 years of wet printing but I don't want to change my film dev times as I have that side nailed and should I require a silver print then I want to be able to still do that with ease.
Sejanus.Aelianus
Veteran
I had a look at your gallery and think you have some very pleasing shots there. There's a gentle "eye on the world" feel to many of them, that agrees with my temperament.
John Bragg
Well-known
Thanks sir. you are very kind.
david.elliott
Well-known
Thanks David. It was taken in extremely contrasty lighting and against the light. it was scanned in colour but perhaps grey scale would work better ? I am on a learning curve after nearly 30 years of wet printing but I don't want to change my film dev times as I have that side nailed and should I require a silver print then I want to be able to still do that with ease.
I always scan everything as color neg. I dont see why you should have to change your developing habits. Scanning is tricky business though, for sure.
Check out these links:
http://benneh.net/blog/2008/04/21/better-colour-neg-scanning-with-vuescan/
http://www.flickr.com/groups/ishootfilm/discuss/72157608204093047/
John Bragg
Well-known
Thankyou for those links David. They are useful. I have gone back to the original scan of the portrait and the information is there. My interpretation of it was too high key and the whites were lost. All part of the learning curve.
david.elliott
Well-known
Be sure to post your new version of it 
John Bragg
Well-known
Here is the revised portrait. it looks better to my eyes.

Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.