MickH
Well-known
A small, disreputable but very vocal minority.
Sparrow
Veteran
I may use that in my signature
sojournerphoto
Veteran
Ah, but you didn't photograph the Ministry of Justice. I did and was given grief by ba pair of non-commissioned security guards who were 'just doing their duty'. I later received a letter that tacitly acknowledged that their action had been contrary to procedure and illegal, but stopped short of apologising for this, preferring to justify the behaviour on grounds of our common security, the terrorist threat and simply apologising that I had been upset by this. I see the distinction as being an important demonstration of the mindset of some people in positions of power (I refuse to use the word authority in this context).
Mike
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
I find it a bit weak that the BBC has made such an issue over this because it was 'one of their own!'
How many other camera users got harassed around 'old blighty' on that particular day for photographing suspiciously I wonder ... and if one of them had rung the said BBC with their story would they have shown any interest?
I doubt it!
How many other camera users got harassed around 'old blighty' on that particular day for photographing suspiciously I wonder ... and if one of them had rung the said BBC with their story would they have shown any interest?
I doubt it!
Last edited:
horosu
Well-known
Very surrealistic....Incredible!
RFluhver
Well-known
And yet, this is the once great civilisation that gave to the world the Magna Carta and the Westminster parliamentary system. What a total joke Britain has become.
Btw, London would have to be the singularly most surveilled place in the world, with all those cameras around. Why don't the British people rise up? Well, they don't because they're too stupid.
Btw, London would have to be the singularly most surveilled place in the world, with all those cameras around. Why don't the British people rise up? Well, they don't because they're too stupid.
Sparrow
Veteran
So true … even today, did habeas corpus die in vain? I ask myself
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
I think generalising about the mental capacity of any country's population is fraught with danger on a democratic forum like this one!
Hope you have your flame proof suit handy!
Hope you have your flame proof suit handy!
Paul T.
Veteran
Well, at least we believe in evolution and have passports!
wgerrard
Veteran
True, but this is an issue that gets little mainstream attention and is something most people are surely not aware of. So, the coverage helped to spread the word.
It's far from a sure thing, however, which side the public will come down on. A lot of people seem to be intent on taking genes, skin color or religion as markers of evil intent, so it wouldn't be a stretch for them to add photographers to their list of things that go bump in the night.
flip
良かったね！
Sad. Then again, didn't England enact a law against public music with repeating beats? Who comes up with this stuff?
januaryman
"Flim? You want flim?"
Was this not overtaken by the power of Captain W and the Patriot Act? (We don't need no stinking badges!)
Sparrow
Veteran
Oddly one thing George W has in common with Abraham Lincoln is that they both suspended habeas corpus.
photocrazy
Established
I've had similiar experience. I was once stopped by a couple of support officers while shooting the parliament building from the South Bank with a tripod. The funny thing is that I was told shooting parliament building with a camera on a tripod was not allowed. The reason was so weired. Would a photographer launch a rocket attact on a tripod?
www.flickr.com/photos/tongfoto/sets
www.flickr.com/photos/tongfoto/sets
JPSuisse
Well-known
Well, this discussion has nothing to do with rangefinders now! But I have to add my 2 cents to it anyway!
I don't think that Britain is really unique here. All the "anglo-saxon" countries are suffering in a similar way. The US is certainly no better. Northern Europe isn't much better, but a little it seems.
Like Roger says, the Latin European countries have managed to escape the worst of it seems. There, terrorism might be an issue. But fixing a good dinner is maybe even more important.
Ack... It makes me sick when I think how the ideals of the American revolution have been perverted.
I take pictures to keep my mind away from thinking about this subject too much.
JP
I don't think that Britain is really unique here. All the "anglo-saxon" countries are suffering in a similar way. The US is certainly no better. Northern Europe isn't much better, but a little it seems.
Like Roger says, the Latin European countries have managed to escape the worst of it seems. There, terrorism might be an issue. But fixing a good dinner is maybe even more important.
Ack... It makes me sick when I think how the ideals of the American revolution have been perverted.
I take pictures to keep my mind away from thinking about this subject too much.
JP
Last edited:
Chris101
summicronia
Usually prohibitions of tripods in public spaces are due to the legs being an impediment to safe movement. That is, clumsy folks tend to trip over them.
Oh, and photographers don't launch rocket attacks.
peewee
Established
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2566/3804698285_1fbd326ec4_o.jpg
Downing street this summer. The police man with the gun seemed unhappy but the other one seemed to enjoy having his photo taken. maybe he was a Leica fan though!
Downing street this summer. The police man with the gun seemed unhappy but the other one seemed to enjoy having his photo taken. maybe he was a Leica fan though!
Last edited:
Turtle
Veteran
This is not unique to the UK; there have been quite a few similar examples in the US posted on this very forum, but I do agree that we, in the UK, have a fairly acute problem. I see one unfortunate commonality between the situation in the UK with photographers and general policing in Afghanistan (ironically), both being driven by an ignorance of the law. This may be almost total in the case of Afghan cops and specific wrt to Brit police, but its unacceptable either way.
There was reference to community support officers, which may well be a factor, but so is the apparent fact that the nature of policing in the UK has changed dramatically in recent years. Policing seems to have become as 'issue ridden' as politics! I have quite a bit f experience in the security sector and will be the first to admit that understanding the nuances of what is legal, whats is not, the limits to authority, common sense, contextual understanding, discretion and sound judgement are not the sector's fortes.
Just as it often is outside a nightclub, I think the first reaction on the part of police is to 'dig in' in that they regard any form of listening or flexibility as a sign of weakness, hence their astounding stubbornness even when confronted by the blinding wrongness of their initial position. It might be somewhat appropriate at 0300hrs outside a night club after a fight, but it has no place much of the rest of the time.
There was reference to community support officers, which may well be a factor, but so is the apparent fact that the nature of policing in the UK has changed dramatically in recent years. Policing seems to have become as 'issue ridden' as politics! I have quite a bit f experience in the security sector and will be the first to admit that understanding the nuances of what is legal, whats is not, the limits to authority, common sense, contextual understanding, discretion and sound judgement are not the sector's fortes.
Just as it often is outside a nightclub, I think the first reaction on the part of police is to 'dig in' in that they regard any form of listening or flexibility as a sign of weakness, hence their astounding stubbornness even when confronted by the blinding wrongness of their initial position. It might be somewhat appropriate at 0300hrs outside a night club after a fight, but it has no place much of the rest of the time.
Lilserenity
Well-known
There was a case local to me yesterday or the day before in Burgess Hill (a small town north of Brighton, pop. 30,000?) where someone was using a Zenit (the Commie's Terrorism Camera of Choice no doubt....) and got stopped by the Stasi... sorry a PCSO (Police Community Support Officer) asking him what he was up to.
Long and short of it, they took his name, address and date of birth -- all for taking photos of CHRISTMAS LIGHTS IN THE TOWN CENTRE.
As for Brits being stupid, well a lot of them are, but so are a lot of people in a lot of nations -- nationality doesn't breed idiocy, the human race does that all by itself.
And yes, some of us are protesting about it and refusing to be questioned like this by people who are not much more than a jumped up traffic warden. I was stopped getting on for 2 years ago in London taking photos of Big Ben, the difference was I had an SLR against a sea of arm's length digital shooters. Damn those 50mm lenses have some reach for all manner of terrorist activity - not.
If there's any solace it doesn't happen often, but once is too often. This is the unfortunate consequence of legislation that was rushed through after 9/11 by our previous PM's government, Tony Bliar (ahem) and now our civil liberties are being taken away.
Anyway I'm gonna stop there as it's making me angry just thinking about it.
And yes raves were banned by the Criminal Justice Act of 1994 by the description of dance music.
Anyway, if you have frustrations like this of any kind, it's best to air them to those who you elect in and hassle them chronically to get things moving; rather than in some muddled rant on the 'net, only to slip into your working attire to become Anonymous Citizen no. 13,655,487 slipping out of suburbia under the hood of complicity only to become vocal again the minute you get on the 'net -- that's what I don't get....
Long and short of it, they took his name, address and date of birth -- all for taking photos of CHRISTMAS LIGHTS IN THE TOWN CENTRE.
As for Brits being stupid, well a lot of them are, but so are a lot of people in a lot of nations -- nationality doesn't breed idiocy, the human race does that all by itself.
And yes, some of us are protesting about it and refusing to be questioned like this by people who are not much more than a jumped up traffic warden. I was stopped getting on for 2 years ago in London taking photos of Big Ben, the difference was I had an SLR against a sea of arm's length digital shooters. Damn those 50mm lenses have some reach for all manner of terrorist activity - not.
If there's any solace it doesn't happen often, but once is too often. This is the unfortunate consequence of legislation that was rushed through after 9/11 by our previous PM's government, Tony Bliar (ahem) and now our civil liberties are being taken away.
Anyway I'm gonna stop there as it's making me angry just thinking about it.
And yes raves were banned by the Criminal Justice Act of 1994 by the description of dance music.
Anyway, if you have frustrations like this of any kind, it's best to air them to those who you elect in and hassle them chronically to get things moving; rather than in some muddled rant on the 'net, only to slip into your working attire to become Anonymous Citizen no. 13,655,487 slipping out of suburbia under the hood of complicity only to become vocal again the minute you get on the 'net -- that's what I don't get....