Bessa R2 Among Best 25 Cameras

P

Peter

Guest
Dear Bessa R2 users, your camera has been listed in the magazine Photo Techniques as one of the top 25 cameras of the world! Best of all only 7 of the listed cameras are 35mm (the rest SLR, digital and medium format). Thus that would make the Bessa R2 as one of the top 35mm cameras! No more would Bessa R2 users be ridiculed by the ultra modern digital crowd. Long live Voigtlander!

:p
 
I've put about five rolls through mine and it has performed flawlessly so far. (owned a month)

There have been a couple of times where the higher shutter noise (than Leica) seemed a factor.

I have found (remembered) that having a completely manual camera keeps you constantly aware of your mix of choices on ISO, f/stop, shutter speed, lens choice, depth of field.

In other words, TOTAL creative control.
 
I am sorry to say this, but to my eye there are a lot of good 35mm cameras above de partially plastic made R2. Just my opinion. Between I have a leitz IIIa from 1936 that is gorgeous
 
Yes, my father has a 1936 Leica too.

I actually prefer my 21st century Voigtlander because of the improved ergonomics such as lever wind, opening back and easier aperture change.

But I never use the meter, and I'd like to turn off the viewfinder display of shutter speed.
 
Jon Claremont said:
Yes, my father has a 1936 Leica too.

I actually prefer my 21st century Voigtlander because of the improved ergonomics such as lever wind, opening back and easier aperture change.

But I never use the meter, and I'd like to turn off the viewfinder display of shutter speed.
Click to expand...

First thing I did when receiving the camera was taking the battery out. I really like my Bessa, and it was much more pleasant to use without the meter indications that would really blind my sight in dark surroundings.
 
I'm the one who chose an R3A, and it needs the battery to work the shutter. Sorry, I should have made that clearer. Great camera.
 
I'm glad the Bessa R2 is getting some recognition.

I've shot one roll so far, very nice handling. The RF patch is well-defined, and finder bright and clear. The meter is just like the Nikon F2AS.
 
I'm not so enthusiastic at the moment about my R2.

I like working in low light conditions and the rangefinder is not so visible. It gives problems also at full aperture due to difficulties in focusing at short distances (rangefinder base isn't good as Leica as far as I read around). It's a good camera if you use it as a travel-generic street gadget but when it comes to "extreme" conditions (low light, small focusing distance) I hope Leica offers much more. This said I can't offer at the moment to Leica the money it requests for it's products so I'll stick with the R2 for a while.
 
edodo said:
I am sorry to say this, but to my eye there are a lot of good 35mm cameras above de partially plastic made R2. Just my opinion. Between I have a leitz IIIa from 1936 that is gorgeous
Click to expand...

Where is the plastic at the R2 ??? :confused: Seems you talk abou something you never held in your hands ? Nonetheless you rate a 1936 III higher ?
A 60yo IIIa is a PIA to use compared to a R2, I once used one for some days, never again.
bertram
 
My only CV camera is a T, and I love it. I'm also happy to see the R2 getting into that list, and I see that as a recognition for the whole Bessa RF family btw. Let's face it, the RF world owes quite a big (huge?) part of its renaissence to Mr. K and his Bessa product line.

And no, I'm not on his payroll, even though I wouldn't mind getting that very special 35/1.2 Nokton in external Nikon S mount ;)

Oscar
 
Bertram2 said:
Where is the plastic at the R2 ??? :confused: Seems you talk abou something you never held in your hands ? Nonetheless you rate a 1936 III higher ?
A 60yo IIIa is a PIA to use compared to a R2, I once used one for some days, never again.
bertram
Click to expand...

Exactly, I have been involved in photography for 50+ years. I have owned
Leica II;III;IIIa;IIIf;and IIIg cameras, I sold the last of them five years ago, and whilst they could take very good photographs, the R2 (with magnesium alloy top back and base!! ) is a far nicer camera to use, especially when like myself your eyes are no longer those of a child!!! In fairness the v/f on the IIIg was an improvement, but still not as good as the R2.
However what do I know, I only use my cameras to take pictures, not as an object to fondle and admire? :rolleyes:
 
I guess that we should all rejoice that Voigtlander is releasing the R2M/R3M, which is a manual version of the R2A/R3A built on the same chassis (read better build than the original R2). I'm assuming that it works without a battery.
 
sockeyed: Yes, though its a pity that its only limited edition.
 
shutterflower said:
I like your avatar, Peter.

And yes, Voigtlander is deserving of praise.
Click to expand...

Thanks shutterflower for your compliment! Voigtlander is the epitome of best value for the money!
 
I think this list comes out yearly no? Top 25 considered on this time? Not bad, but no big deal.
 
I like my R2 a lot. In many ways I find it a bit easier to use and operate than my MP. It deffinitelly deserves a high prize. Now whether it should be in top 25 or not that's very subjective. In two-three years of use it performed flawlessly. I found it to be a great travel camera and it deffinitelly attracts some attention. Many people are intrigued by its olive green color and quite a few digital users found it very "strong". All in all I am selling it now simply becasue I have a MP now.
 
I'm pretty confident that Cosina will release a regular (non-special edition) R2M/R3M sometime in the next year. I just feel it in my bones.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom