Nando
Well-known
- Local time
- 4:39 PM
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2006
- Messages
- 1,122
Hi,
Perhaps you don't remember me but around 2 months ago I was asking advice on creating a good rangefinder kit. At first I was torn between what lenses to choose but then I became torn between choosing either a Bessa-T or an R2.
Well, I got me a Bessa-T with the 35/1.7 Ultron at that time to test the waters. I've been really enjoying the camera and lens so a few days ago I ordered a 21/4 Color Skopar and 75/2.5 Color Heliar from Cameraquest. I cannot wait until they arrive!
Anyway, upon hearing about my purchases a colleague of mine presented me with the opportunity to buy a very nice 135/4.5 Hektor. Being a newbie at this, the price he gave me seemed incredibly low for a Leica lens but upon seeing some examples that sold on Ebay, I saw that the price was reasonable. Although I don't think I use the Hektor often, I wouldn't mind picking it up since it is in very nice condition and a liked the few Hektor photos I saw here on RFF.
Anyway, I was told that my Bessa-T had a short baselength and, despite the 1.5x magnification, a 75mm or a 90mm should be about as big as I should go. He said that my camera's baselength was like that of a Leica CL, which according to him was very short compared the baselengths of the regular Leica M's. However, Stephen Gandy's tooted the fact that the Bessa-T had a longer effective baselength than the .72 M6 (57.3.7 vs 49.86) on his website. I'm a bit confused.
What do you guys think? Should I feed my GAS cravings and get that Hektor?
Perhaps you don't remember me but around 2 months ago I was asking advice on creating a good rangefinder kit. At first I was torn between what lenses to choose but then I became torn between choosing either a Bessa-T or an R2.
Well, I got me a Bessa-T with the 35/1.7 Ultron at that time to test the waters. I've been really enjoying the camera and lens so a few days ago I ordered a 21/4 Color Skopar and 75/2.5 Color Heliar from Cameraquest. I cannot wait until they arrive!
Anyway, upon hearing about my purchases a colleague of mine presented me with the opportunity to buy a very nice 135/4.5 Hektor. Being a newbie at this, the price he gave me seemed incredibly low for a Leica lens but upon seeing some examples that sold on Ebay, I saw that the price was reasonable. Although I don't think I use the Hektor often, I wouldn't mind picking it up since it is in very nice condition and a liked the few Hektor photos I saw here on RFF.
Anyway, I was told that my Bessa-T had a short baselength and, despite the 1.5x magnification, a 75mm or a 90mm should be about as big as I should go. He said that my camera's baselength was like that of a Leica CL, which according to him was very short compared the baselengths of the regular Leica M's. However, Stephen Gandy's tooted the fact that the Bessa-T had a longer effective baselength than the .72 M6 (57.3.7 vs 49.86) on his website. I'm a bit confused.
What do you guys think? Should I feed my GAS cravings and get that Hektor?