Best camera for low light social photography - to replace / supplement M9??

The x100s is the perfect camera for the situations you describe.
Used in manual focus with the optical Viewfinder or Rear LCD for framing you will be unobtrusive in taking your images.
Performance wise you will easily get 3 stops of exposure (clean RAW files not noisy DNG's) and at least 3 times the DOF as compared to the M9 at the same shutter speeds mounted with a 35mm lens.

It's a quite leaf shutter and extremely flexible for a fixed lens camera.

Go try one and see what you think.

Cheers!
 
Good luck, particularly with that unobtrusive thingy, but also with the focus. I certainly am not an expert on all forms of digital cameras but auto focus in very low light circumstances is usually a bit of a challenge. Every Halloween I keep telling myself autofocus has gotten better and every time I find that I am very glad that I packed my rangefinder along with the dSLR. I don't want to say that autofocus doesn't work, it does. It just doesn't work as well at night and thus far more frustrating.

The other thing that people forget, when using autofocus you are waiting for the camera to do its own thing, with the rangefinder you are fully involved in the process and so your own attention is totally on the focus point. This does make a difference for me, your own mileage may vary.
 
As stated, the AF on the 6D is apparently very good, even in low light. 5d3 as well, AFAIK (although I don't now the differences in the two). They are both normal size for pro DSLRs so they're huge. Their ISO performance is excellent though. I would have no qualms about shooting at 3200.

The Sony RX1 has similar ISO performance and is tiny. The caveat is that the AF is abysmal in low light (and even not so great in not excellent light). If you're used to manual focusing lenses. It is helped quite a bit with the AF assist (the orange LED) but that might disrupt the subject. You can focus w/ the LED though, and you can set up the buttons to "quickly" change the focus point. It takes some getting used to. If your subjects are socializing my guess is you'll get most of your shots. If they're walking, dream on. The rapid fire mode in it is almost absurd. 5 FPS... I usually have it turned down to the slower mode, but if you have a moving target it can mean the difference of a keeper and a throw-away.

It might be worth waiting for the R7 and R7 Alphas. They are said to have updated AF systems, but how much is unknown. The launch 35mm is also only 2.8. :-?

I have no clue what goes into an autofocus system size wise, but apparently to be good, they require a large body.
 
I'd go with a Monochrom. Have heard wonderful things about its low light capabilities, and you already have all the lenses for it.

As long as you can live with Black & White.

Best,
-Tim
 
porktaco said:
the correct answer is the x100s. the AF is ok in low light (great at ISO 400, requires a tad of preparation at 6400 and f2), but the manual focus assist makes "ok" turn into "just fine, thank you". it's tiny, unobtrusive and utterly silent, and the 35mm FOV equivalent lens is wide enough and has close-enough focus to make in-crowd photography really fun. high ISO is lovely. at night, in a club or at a party, you can shoot at 6400 with a lot of confidence. i bought the camera for almost precisely the application you described and it's nearly perfect. i still get focus errors (i think the x200 will have better AF if you can wait) but i'm really happy with it.
Click to expand...

ditto. And like he said it is SILENT. Not just quiet. SILENT
 
SimonPJ said:
In the 25 plus years that I've been using Leicas one of my main uses for them has been documenting social or work events that I'm participating in - usually when I'm sitting amongst the people I'm photographing, and often in very poor light because it's indoors, or late in the day. I know this is a familiar situation for many on RFF.
...
So, I've been wondering whether there are any interesting alternatives to try that would work better - or at least, differently - in these low light social situations.
...
Click to expand...

Go to a smaller format, like Micro-FourThirds, and a manual lens, for example one of the Voigtländers (17, 25 and 43 mm choices, all f/0.95). Current generation (E-P5, E-M1, E-M5, GX7) sensors are good for up to ISO 6400 and beyond. The smaller format nets you more DoF at even wide lens openings. A manual focus lens will let you focus by zone precisely, and those Voigtländers give you even more light gathering power to work with in a pinch.

With the cameras I mentioned above, you can also use Live View to an articulated LCD so you can shoot at waist level or around corners, while having excellent access to focusing and framing tools.

With all of the cameras above, you can also use AF lenses with face detection. There is a host of fast prime lenses from Panasonic and Olympus, all fully dedicated, that can be used.

Lots of options nowadays.

G

(I have an M9 too, and while it is responsive and works reasonably well in these circumstances, the Olympus E-M1 is far more responsive and can do quite a lot better job of this kind of shooting. It is a very different way of working with the camera, however.)
 
I would recommend the fuji X100s. I use mine for the type of photography you describe- great in low light, fast focussing, silent. Iso 3200 great, 6400 ok. Probably the best choice given your requirements.
 
darya151 said:
I am curious, is the GXR faster to focus in low light than the X100S?
Darya
Click to expand...

Can't answer for the X100s but the GXR a12 mount is for Leica M lenses so manual focus. The a12 50/2.5 is aps-c also, if you wanted auto focus capability. Nice thing about the Ricoh is in auto focus mode there is snap focus, distance is user preset and a full depression of the shutter button bypasses AF. 3200 iso definitely usable.
 
The most inobtrusive would be be a Windows Nokia 920 or 1020. Don't laugh. They don't come any more inobtrusive, are excellent low-light performers with Zeiss 2.0, 2.4 lenses respectively and mechanical OIS. IQ is surprisingly okay. Why not bring your Leica and a smart phone with good quality low-light capabilities to supplement? This is more practical than bringing two cameras -- or leave a fine camera like your Leica on the shelf.
 
i use and very much like the gxr m, the epl5 (thus current gen of m4/3 sensor) and an x100. the gxr is both difficult to focus and its results disappointing in low light--1600 is the limit. epl5 focuses faster than the x100, but its shutter is much noisier. at 3200 the results are fine with both, and each is better in b&w. in that regard, of the two the x has better b&w rendition, the oly better color in low light. i would not shoot above 3200 with either.
 
the good thing with the x100s is that you have 3 valid focusing options for this situation: AF, focus peak and split image. Rare to find someone who didn't make at least one of them work for him, but maybe go to a shop and try for yourself. Also, because the lens is one stop slower than your f1.4 and 12mm wider, you will get maybe 2 stops worth more depth of field which makes manual focusing less demanding.

for shutter speed, compared to your M9+summi you get 1 stop less from the aperture but probably 1 (or slightly more) stops gain from the high ISO ability, so the net result is even or to your favor.
 
Just a positive vote for the whole idea… I find it incredibly liberating with current digital cameras to shoot in available light, indoors, in the kind of light that fosters social interaction. At the dining table, in the living room, in a moody restaurant. Shooting at ISO 3200 opens all kinds of possibilities.

I shoot with a DSLR, currently a Nikon D600, use single point autofocus, and I take lots of shots. Focus errors and subject movement kill a lot of images.
 
Simon-I can speak only to my x100 as excellent for low light, silent and my choice for a digital version of film when I am not using my M6. I also prefer the sensor in the x100 vs. the Xtrans in the 100s to my eye and the most recent Firmware 2.0 has made the biggest difference in manual focusing, AF has always been some what acceptable for me and the 2.0 has helped with AF a tad bit more…… good luck-Daniel.
 
I am using a D600 to cover what M9 can't do, but finding a good f-mount lens that is as good as a modern Leica asph lens is tough.
 
JuJu said:
I am using a D600 to cover what M9 can't do, but finding a good f-mount lens that is as good as a modern Leica asph lens is tough.
Click to expand...

"As Good($)" enough to trade in for a car.... not as easily as Leica..... no.
"As Good" enough to get the image at wide open in low light.... Yes, Nikon has that good.
 
for social situations, i think the panasonic gm1 with the upcoming leica 15/1.7 would be completely appropriate.
 
You can push the Leica M9 two stops in LR shooting at ISO640. So I too use the 35 Lux at a half stop above f/1.4 as I have the pre-ASPH version so keep from getting lens flare. So far I'm happy with those results. See no need to have another kit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom