I'm wondering about Rodinal. Recently Carter sent me an old Pop Photo article by Bob Schwalburg, which stated that Rodinal didn't achieve it's best performance with continuous agitation because it (the agitation) reduced the edge/adjacency effects that give the special sharpness or accutance, and also reduces any compensating effects limiting over-development of highlights. There must be a lot of people who have used it, but I wonder if anyone has tested specifically for this. The dilution must be important. I do like the grain structure of TRI-X 400 developed normally in Rodinal or ID-11 1+3.
Rodinal would have its potential wasted in a rotary processor. HC-110 and T-Max do very well with rapid agitation. Many Tetenal developers have a fast inversion regime with three second intervals listed on their spec sheet and should do well, too.
One thing to be aware of is that rotation and a temperature a few degrees above room temperature (you're only able to warm rather than cool the bath) will shift the development times for most developers below five minutes, the minimum recommendation for a plain Jobo - you need the accessory Lift if you want to maintain reasonable accuracy down to two minutes.
...One thing to be aware of is that rotation and a temperature a few degrees above room temperature (you're only able to warm rather than cool the bath) will shift the development times for most developers below five minutes, the minimum recommendation for a plain Jobo - you need the accessory Lift if you want to maintain reasonable accuracy down to two minutes.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.