Hard to recommend because of sample variations. Personally, I like TTArtisan range with click stops. Individual lenses I like are the 28/2.8 Meike, 25/1.8 Pergear and especially the super fast 35/0.95 7Artisans.
I...And I always understood the Fuji-X cameras to rely pretty heavily on software corrections for many common lens aberrations. Such corrections would be missing when using a non-electronic lens, no?
The software correction dependence only applies to FUJINON XF lenses. The camera itself does not require optical software corrections.
Images from a telecentric third-party lens that happen to have nearly perfect optical properties will not be compromised with a FUJIFILM X (or any other digital) camera. [1]
,
To correct image optical distortions from third-party lenses requires post-production correction software. This is the case for both in-camera JPEGs and raw files.
1. This is not the case if the lens has a non-telocentric optical designs. All digital cameras using non-telocentric lenses will have vignetting and other artifacts due to color and resolution cross-talk between adjacent pixels. Non-telocentric artifact levels are highly dependent on lens optics, sensor micro-lens assembly optics and pixel separation.
Ha! That brings back memories of the 70’s, my formative photographic time period. A favorite slur for a (optically) bad lens was;
‘Hey, it’s a coke bottle’. Never got around to it but since I had experience grinding and polishing my own telescope mirrors I wanted to cut out the bottom of a coke bottle, grind it into a lens, I figured I’d go for about 90-100mm, and mount it on a SLR. Then it could truly be called a coke bottle.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.