Best one shot Developer with HP5 Plus or Tri X.

SCOTFORTHLAD

SCOTFORTHLAD

Slow learner,but keen!
Local time
12:11 AM
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
770
Could you humour me with a query ,which no doubt has been brought up before.It is some time since I home processed in B/W,at which time it was FP4 and Ilfosol.I am thinking of dipping my toe in the water again,but using HP5 or TX,and am looking for any advice or comments which you can offer.I would be using 35mm and 120 film at different times, and not
looking to push or pull at all.Thanks.
Brian.
 
Last edited:
Brian,

I go with popstar and Mark - DDX. It is expensive but it's bloody nice. I use it with HP5+ @ 1600 & 400. I like Ilfosol when HP5+ is at 400 too.

I've also shot a couple of rolls of Tri-X @ 1600 and run them through Diafine, very cheap but the grain ... needs getting used to.
 
I've only started developing my own bw negs a while ago and only tried out Ilfosol-s so far. Shot almost exclusively medium format HP5+ and the results have been pretty nice so far.
 
kully said:
Brian,

I go with popstar and Mark - DDX. It is expensive but it's bloody nice. I use it with HP5+ @ 1600 & 400. I like Ilfosol when HP5+ is at 400 too.

I've also shot a couple of rolls of Tri-X @ 1600 and run them through Diafine, very cheap but the grain ... needs getting used to.
Click to expand...

Try your TriX at 1250 and Diafine.

For a one off though, I use DDX and like the results.
 
D76 or DD76 for the classic look.
Kodak XTOL and Ilford DD-X if you wangt every ounce of performance.

You can't go wrong with any of them
 
I've used DD-X and liked what I saw on the negs, but it has a higher base + fog density, so if you are wet-printing this may be important. Other than that, I agree with Gene: Rodinal or HC-110. D76 largely leaves me cold, though ther are those here who use it well. I've also used Edwal FG-7 and like it, though it has more sulfite thus the grain is "shaved" more than an acutance developer such as HC-110 or Rodinal.

Another optin would be a PMK developer. I haven't used it, but have seen great results with it, at least with Tri-X. I've seen a few good results with Diafine, but lots of not-so-good results as well. I think Diafine is overrated, but that's a horribly subjective opinion based on no personal experience. :angel:
 
Rodinal all the way for Tri-X. :D I prefer DD-X for HP5+, for me Ilford chemicals tend to match well with Ilford films.
 
I use home mixed D76. I use it one shot undiluted or 1:1. I costs me $3 gallan to make. That is 16 rolls per gallon undiluted. Do the math.
 
I always liked Ilfotec HC when I was developing film in the bathroom. The concentrate seemed to keep well, and it gave great results with HP5.
 
XTOL 1:2 for Tri-x and FP4+, I really liked the results with FP4+.. but then again, I'm sort of a noob with this B&W wet chemistry. Gots to try DD-X and Diafine eventually.
 
Xtol 1:1 for tri-x is very nice, anywhere from 200 to 1600 :)

For those of you doing tri-x in rodinal, what's your methodology? I've tried it once, but the results were.. poor.
 
jano said:
Xtol 1:1 for tri-x is very nice, anywhere from 200 to 1600 :)

For those of you doing tri-x in rodinal, what's your methodology? I've tried it once, but the results were.. poor.
Click to expand...

Jano,

for Tri-X in rodinal I usually go with 1:100 20C for about 20mins at EI400 or 15 at EI200. Agitate continuously for the first 30 seconds, then agitate for 10 secs every 3rd minute. This gives remarkably fine grained, sharp negatives. Times quoted are for diffusion, you may want to reduce them a bit for scanning or condensers. I've had no problems using 3ml of concentrate made up to 300ml for a Paterson tank.

Mark
 
Rodinal or Ilfosol S for convenience and result. Don't like the Xtol, use it with Delta or Acros not for old school films. It creates too soft negatives for my taste. And of course D76. But if you don't want the hassle to mix and dilute powder, Xtol&D76 for example, go the mentioned Rodinal or Ilfosol S. I usually go 1:50 for the Rodinal... I have heard good things about the DD-X but haven't tried it yet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom