jamin-b
Well-known
I am considering getting either a Werramat or a Rollei 35 - as a pocketable reliable, fun camera, mostly for b/w, generally shooting at around F8 since they are zone focus. Either way it will be a tessar lens and I like to have a light meter, at least for a sanity check.
Any hands on experience that would indicate a preference in terms of image quality, reliability, usability (or other)?
Any hands on experience that would indicate a preference in terms of image quality, reliability, usability (or other)?
David Hughes
David Hughes
Hi,
Werras; - I'd go for either the simplest one in green (fun) or else the RF and meter and 3 lenses (serious) version.
My main complaint is that it is easy to cross thread the hood when reversing it on to the body. Secondly, if you forget which way to turn the thing to remove the lens then you can jam it on permanently.
And the meters are now very elderly but seem no better and no worse than any other old meter. Finding instruction manuals seems impossible...
Regards, David
Werras; - I'd go for either the simplest one in green (fun) or else the RF and meter and 3 lenses (serious) version.
My main complaint is that it is easy to cross thread the hood when reversing it on to the body. Secondly, if you forget which way to turn the thing to remove the lens then you can jam it on permanently.
And the meters are now very elderly but seem no better and no worse than any other old meter. Finding instruction manuals seems impossible...
Regards, David
sevo
Fokutorendaburando
Both are odd designers pieces that seem to add bizarre quirks just for the heck of being different. Either will do, if you have the mindset of a Isetta or Reliant driver. As a reliable and practical rather than strange photography tool, there are many better options - my Werramats all jammed soon, and I always missed the shot when using the Rollei as I forgot to expand the lens...
I now use a Petri Color as the vintage camera of that form factor...
I now use a Petri Color as the vintage camera of that form factor...
Muggins
Junk magnet
For pocket use, the lens cap on the Werra is a weakness as they are 50+ year old plastic, and very prone to breaking. Beyond that, so long as you don't wind on with your finger on the shutter release (it jams the mechanism, and you have to remove the top cover to unjam it), it's a nice camera - though be aware that some versions lock the shutter speed and aperture ring together so you can shoot by EV, which is a bit of a PITA if you don't.
Roger wrote a very good review in Shutterbug a few years ago now.
Adrian
Roger wrote a very good review in Shutterbug a few years ago now.
Adrian
ruby.monkey
Veteran
Try 'em in the hand before you make your decision. The Werras don't have a lot of finger-room for your right hand (I always found mine more comfortable to use if I held it with my left hand and worked all the controls with my right).
Dguebey
Amateur
Pocketable ? for that the only response is Rollei 35.
I love my Werramatic but it is not really a pocket camera.
I love my Werramatic but it is not really a pocket camera.
FrankS
Registered User
Rollei !
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Seconded!Pocketable ? for that the only response is Rollei 35.
I love my Werramatic but it is not really a pocket camera.
Cheers,
R.
flavio81
Well-known
I am considering getting either a Werramat or a Rollei 35 - as a pocketable reliable, fun camera, mostly for b/w, generally shooting at around F8 since they are zone focus. Either way it will be a tessar lens and I like to have a light meter, at least for a sanity check.
Any hands on experience that would indicate a preference in terms of image quality, reliability, usability (or other)?
I owned both.
Rollei 35 is heavy so don't get fooled by the small size. It is an ergonomical nightmare. And the focus scale is poor, it does not allow setting the focus with precision, unlike other scale focus cameras. Put it in your pocket and the focus setting will be disturbed wildly (i.e. 3 meters --> infinity). So it is not ready to shoot as soon as you take it out (and you need to uncollapse that lens). Want to protect the lens? Good luck finding a cap or a filter in that filter size. Ok, ebay is always to the rescue.
I had the Minox 35GT and it was a more practical camera overall. Open the lid and the lens uncollapses with the scale focus setting undisturbed and the AE mechanism means you can just instantly shoot.
Olympus Pen S, i liked more than the R35... more usable overall and has almost the same dimensions. Plus it is always ready to shoot, it does not require uncollapsing the lens. The lens is excellent, as well. Focus scale is great and it is a full unit focusing lens, not a front-cell focusing lens. It is a half frame camera but the lens is high resolution so with fine grain film you will still be satisfied.
Werra 3 has an amazing rangefinder and has good ergonomics. It is bigger, though. Nosier.
Leave the Rollei 35 to the collectors that want to pay good money for them.
To be honest i'd be trying the Olympus 35RC and similar alternatives.
All these cameras have great image quality, so don't worry about that.
flavio81
Well-known
PS: Also consider the Olympus Trip 35. It is bigger, it is only auto-exposure, but it still compact and very light, so "pocketeable."
PS: The Agfa "solinette" and "super solinette." Google those tiny things. I wish i had one.
PS: The Agfa "solinette" and "super solinette." Google those tiny things. I wish i had one.
rhl-oregon
Cameras Guitars Wonders
I've owned a Werramatic, Werra IV, and Rollei S. As folks have said, the Rollei is the pants-pocketable choice; though the Werra body is small, all its important functions are packed into/onto its protuberant lens/mount. My Werramatic lube was pretty dried out, too, which should be a consideration. The viewfinders are delightful in good examples of either, but the Rollei operates more straightforwardly.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.