Larry Cloetta
Veteran
You need a 2 inch Hugo Meyer Kino-Plasmat lens on your camera or else you are wasting your time with photography.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Hugo-Meyer-Kino-Plasmat-2inch-f-1-5-50mm-Z16F0061/142075148597
That's exactly what I was going to say.
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
OP should keep on buying and trying. Here is no best lens, camera for folks like OP.
Personally, I lost my count on how many LTM 50 I have tried.
Personally, I lost my count on how many LTM 50 I have tried.
Daryl J.
Well-known
In 50mm a different rendering style can be had by Lomography's "new" Jupiter 3.
Unless your Summicron has technical issues from scratches or haze or damage its going to be hard to find "better". It should be easy, however, to find variety. Most lenses out there in proper mechanical condition exceed the skills of their operators.
Unless your Summicron has technical issues from scratches or haze or damage its going to be hard to find "better". It should be easy, however, to find variety. Most lenses out there in proper mechanical condition exceed the skills of their operators.
presspass
filmshooter
If you are wet printing black and white, the lower contrast lenses are easier to work with. I have and use a pre-war uncoated Elmar 35 f3.5 and a pre-war uncoated Summar 50 f2.0. Used with a hood, both can produce sharp shots that do not blow out the highlights. To see what an excellent photographer could do with lenses of this vintage, check Erik's shots on this site or Google the work of James Ravilious who shot life in the English countryside. The condition of the lens - unscratched with no fungus or fog - is probably more important than which lens you choose.
Last edited:
wpb
Well-known
Canon 50f1.5
Perfect size for body, excellent fit and finish, medium contrast good for B&W, 1 stop faster, sonnar design has enough difference to distinguish it from 'cron at f1.5-4, a good one should hold its value.
Perfect size for body, excellent fit and finish, medium contrast good for B&W, 1 stop faster, sonnar design has enough difference to distinguish it from 'cron at f1.5-4, a good one should hold its value.
mpaniagua
Newby photographer
Somehow on topic, Is there a difference between Later Summitar (coated) and Collapsible Summicron? I own both but Summicron focus ring is stuck so need a CLA. Really love the results I get from the Summitar.
Regards.
Regards.
kb244
Well-known
In 50mm a different rendering style can be had by Lomography's "new" Jupiter 3.
Unless your Summicron has technical issues from scratches or haze or damage its going to be hard to find "better". It should be easy, however, to find variety. Most lenses out there in proper mechanical condition exceed the skills of their operators.
Lomography own the Jupiter line now or something?
wpb
Well-known
The Summicron is the technical progression from the Summitar: better corrected for image sharpness across the entire image wide open. Really only a jump in image quality at f2-f4. Both are excellent image makers when in good condition. Send that Cron to Sherry Krauter for a "full bath".
Jake Mongey
Well-known
Would recommend the canon 135mm 3.5 as it has beautiful compression and fantastic sharpness along with lovely bokeh. It was largely neglected because of the odd focal length on my canon 7 but when I realized its potential its become one of my most used lenses!
Heres a shot from my grandfather with this lens from sometime around 1970

Heres a shot from my grandfather with this lens from sometime around 1970
presspass
filmshooter
Agree on the two Canon lens recommendations. The 50 1.5 is outstanding and the 135 f3.5 is a wonderful lens.
rfaspen
[insert pithy phrase here]
The Industar-69. The vignetting is just beautiful in B+W.
ChrisLivsey
Veteran
Best LTM lens simple:
V-Summilux LTM of 1999 (code 11621 Summilux II):
or
original 50mm Summilux I (code 11014 or SOWGE)
then, when the OP has a look, perhaps "value" will be added to best?
V-Summilux LTM of 1999 (code 11621 Summilux II):
or
original 50mm Summilux I (code 11014 or SOWGE)
then, when the OP has a look, perhaps "value" will be added to best?
ChrisLivsey
Veteran
^lol
talking about vague questions, the real way to deal with that is to use neutral questioning to tease out what they're really looking for, but i'm too lazy on the internet. it's too much like work.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/afe0/3051cdfc37d0b5d227c49aeae21feedf1f0a.pdf
An interesting link but a note of caution from the text:
Their drawback is that they elicit conversation that is irrelevant
I make no further comment.
johannielscom
Snorting silver salts
Would recommend the canon 135mm 3.5 as it has beautiful compression and fantastic sharpness along with lovely bokeh. It was largely neglected because of the odd focal length on my canon 7 but when I realized its potential its become one of my most used lenses!
![]()
Heres a shot from my grandfather with this lens from sometime around 1970
You had a very good-looking grandfather back in the day, Jake!
David Hughes
David Hughes
The Industar-69. The vignetting is just beautiful in B+W.
That's not the word I'd use...
Regards, David
nukecoke
⚛Yashica
aizan
Veteran
An interesting link but a note of caution from the text:
Their drawback is that they elicit conversation that is irrelevant
I make no further comment.
note: that's in reference to "open" questions.
lynnb
Veteran
To the OP: don't you already have an Elmar?
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2672321&postcount=1
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2672321&postcount=1
jusxusfanatic
Well-known
Thanks for the replies
I sold my elmar a months ago, and got the collapsible cron. Might consider getting the elmar again
I sold my elmar a months ago, and got the collapsible cron. Might consider getting the elmar again
jusxusfanatic
Well-known
But my cron is already pretty good
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.