bherman
bherman
All;
I'l looking for some additional SDHC cards for my Leica M8.2. I have a couple of Sandisk Extreme III 8GB SDHC, but they're about a year old, and now Sandisk has out (at an additional premium), Extreme III SDHC 30MB/sec. cards.
Are they worth it? Will my .DNG files read/write faster with these cards? Does the I/F in the Leica allow for those write speeds?
Thanks
Brad
I'l looking for some additional SDHC cards for my Leica M8.2. I have a couple of Sandisk Extreme III 8GB SDHC, but they're about a year old, and now Sandisk has out (at an additional premium), Extreme III SDHC 30MB/sec. cards.
Are they worth it? Will my .DNG files read/write faster with these cards? Does the I/F in the Leica allow for those write speeds?
Thanks
Brad
johnastovall
Light Hunter - RIP 2010
I use that card in the 8gig and it's well worth it and works just fine.
Ricko of Fla
Established
I purchased Sandisk II from Buy.com at a great price and they work great.
M8 is not a High speed shooter, so any one will work great, a II or the III if you want to pay extra and it will not work any faster than a II in the M8. Don't get carried way with speed. This is not a canon or Nikon.
M8 is not a High speed shooter, so any one will work great, a II or the III if you want to pay extra and it will not work any faster than a II in the M8. Don't get carried way with speed. This is not a canon or Nikon.
Efra1
Established
I purchased Sandisk II from Buy.com at a great price and they work great.
M8 is not a High speed shooter, so any one will work great, a II or the III if you want to pay extra and it will not work any faster than a II in the M8. Don't get carried way with speed. This is not a canon or Nikon.
You are right, but remember, the speed is very important when you put the card in a card reader to load the pics to the computer.
8 Gigas in a slow card can take a lot of time.
JohnTF
Veteran
Leica rep just said the Ultra III are dandy. ;-)
Regards, John
Regards, John
bherman
bherman
Best SDHC Memory Card for the Leica M8.2?
Thanks guys!
Regards:
Brad
Thanks guys!
Regards:
Brad
Ken Shipman
Well-known
I don't understand his thing with bigger and bigger cards. Shooting RAW a 4gb card holds the equivalent of TEN 36-exposure rolls of film! Much much more with JPG. What's the point of bigger cards?
Frankly with that much on a card I'm a little concerned about putting too many eggs in one basket, if you know what I mean.
Frankly with that much on a card I'm a little concerned about putting too many eggs in one basket, if you know what I mean.
oldoc
oldoc
I agree with Ken.
Lose 8 GB of photos...lost your whole trip!
Lose 8 GB of photos...lost your whole trip!
JohnTF
Veteran
Always seems like a good idea at the time, plus when you put a loaded card in the reader, it does take a bit of time to look at all the files.
I moved the files to a WD usb hard drive, a friend files his 2 GB cards, who knows, they might be more durable as archival storage?
I moved the files to a WD usb hard drive, a friend files his 2 GB cards, who knows, they might be more durable as archival storage?
Roger Hicks
Veteran
I agree with Ken.
Lose 8 GB of photos...lost your whole trip!
Seconded. I never use more than 2 GB and am thinking of going back to 1.
I also second the endorsement of fast cards for fast download.
Tasho delek,
R.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.