srtiwari
Daktari
My recently acquired ZM 35/2 is disappointing. I thought at first it might be my R3A, but a roll in my M6 seems just as uninspiring.
My other lenses (Hexanon m 35, Canon 35/2, even CV 35/2.5) are all decidedly "sharper". Since "sharpness" is a somewhat subjective quality, it is difficult to be certain if anything is actually wrong. I am told that the Biogon is known to be a very sharp lens.
I wonder if the lens needs to readjusted for focus. I have also wondered if it is a "Bad sample" since it does not seem sharp anywhere- not just the subject in question.
I am considering sending it for testing, but don't know who to send it to. OTOH, perhaps someone on RFF can compare with their copy ? (I don't mind sending it out for that).
These two photos may give some idea. All frames were scanned on a Nikon 9000ED.
The first is a 100% crop from the sharpest part of a frame.
The second is a complete frame and shows no area that is particularly sharp.
I would welcome any advice.
My other lenses (Hexanon m 35, Canon 35/2, even CV 35/2.5) are all decidedly "sharper". Since "sharpness" is a somewhat subjective quality, it is difficult to be certain if anything is actually wrong. I am told that the Biogon is known to be a very sharp lens.
I wonder if the lens needs to readjusted for focus. I have also wondered if it is a "Bad sample" since it does not seem sharp anywhere- not just the subject in question.
I am considering sending it for testing, but don't know who to send it to. OTOH, perhaps someone on RFF can compare with their copy ? (I don't mind sending it out for that).
These two photos may give some idea. All frames were scanned on a Nikon 9000ED.
The first is a 100% crop from the sharpest part of a frame.
The second is a complete frame and shows no area that is particularly sharp.
I would welcome any advice.