Britain's treatment of photographers makes undemocratic Cuba look angelic

[MickH]

And the bloody horse thing is from the play

😀

Carry that on to its logical conclusion and more recent history, say WW2 and Viet Nam, will be interpreted through the eyes of gung-ho John Wayne movies.

Oh, hang on a minute....

 

[Roger Hicks]

Damaso... Interesting article that.

I wonder how a 'private citizen' would fare under similar circumstances. Would the same interpretation of the law apply, or are photo-journalists a special case?

Dear Mick,

People who stand up for their rights and can quote ACPO guidelines are a special case.

Cheers,

R.

 

[Sparrow]

😀

Carry that on to its logical conclusion and more recent history, say WW2 and Viet Nam, will be interpreted through the eyes of gung-ho John Wayne movies.

Oh, hang on a minute....

din't stop with the Duke, We Were Soldiers from 2002 ... hordes of soldiers all bunched up in clear view, advancing on the enemy exactly how one wouldn't ... and the chap finding his Nikon F hanging on a shrub, geeze

 

[Olsen]

Ya, right based on what, a play written to please a despot Queen, daughter of another despot and granddaughter to another ... and no he didnt limp and the hump was painted on that Holbein afterwards 🙄

Modern historians, I am sure, bases their assumptions on far deeper research than Shakespeare's play (which I believe was written by Francis Bacon, but that's another issue). As far as I remember, there is nothing on the two boy's in the Richard III play. But the boys are historical persons for a fact and disappeared in their uncle's, Richard III's, custody. Most likely at the Tower.

 

[Michael Markey]

Couldn't you trade in one of the horses to a M9? Two, and you can include a WATE.

Now that is a good idea 🙂 Sorry we have strayed off topic.

 

[Michael Markey]

All I can add about the court case is that Thompsons always act on behalf of unions.

 

[MickH]

Well, of course it does help to have a T.U. paying the lawyer's fee.

 

[Olsen]

All I can add about the court case is that Thompsons always act on behalf of unions.

Which means...?

 

[Michael Markey]

Which means...?

Er nothing. Just an additional bit of info. They are a firm that specialises in cases on behalf of UK trade unions.

 

[MickH]

Which means...?

We were back on the original topic (sort-of), sorry about that.

 

[Sparrow]

Modern historians, I am sure, bases their assumptions on far deeper research than Shakespeare's play (which I believe was written by Francis Bacon, but that's another issue). As far as I remember, there is nothing on the two boy's in the Richard III play. But the boys are historical persons for a fact and disappeared in their uncle's, Richard III's, custody. Most likely at the Tower.

Yep, your right, fine, you live on in your own world ... we'll just carry on here if that's OK?

 

[payasam]

Yes, let's carry on. We're doing pretty well. I've no idea what we're doing, but that's neither here nor there.

 

[Trius]

Now if you chose a good Pict or something...

Yes, blue is true.