Steve M.
Veteran
I am thinking of selling my 'blad (too much money tied up in it, backs are a little fiddeley, but otherwise no complaints!) and was looking at the Bronica SQ as a much cheaper alternative, but I'm not convinced on the lenses. If you do some googeling, nearly everyone says that there is little if any difference between the Bronica lenses and the Hasselblads. In other words, the Bronica lenses are "good enough". But when I look at sample photos on flickr the differences seem to be pretty darn evident!
I'm just looking at the 80 2.8's, which would be the only lens I would want, but the Planar on the Hasselblads looks a lot sharper and has better bokeh than the Bronica lenses.
Is it just me, or do others see it? I wonder if there's anyone here that switched to Bronica because they saw little difference between the IQ's, or went the other way because they saw the Hasselblad lenses as better? This is always the problem when I look at web images of different lenses. I can't determine if it's the lens, or if the photographer just nailed it and it would have been a great shot w/ a Holga.
I'm just looking at the 80 2.8's, which would be the only lens I would want, but the Planar on the Hasselblads looks a lot sharper and has better bokeh than the Bronica lenses.
Is it just me, or do others see it? I wonder if there's anyone here that switched to Bronica because they saw little difference between the IQ's, or went the other way because they saw the Hasselblad lenses as better? This is always the problem when I look at web images of different lenses. I can't determine if it's the lens, or if the photographer just nailed it and it would have been a great shot w/ a Holga.
Last edited: