Budget Glass Hall of Fame

NickTrop

NickTrop

Veteran
Local time
4:19 PM
Joined
Feb 19, 2006
Messages
3,077
I'll start, follow this format:

Lens: Quantaray Tech-10 24mm f2.8 macro
Mount: Numerous mounts (mine is Nikon)
Reason: It's a rebadged Sigma Ultra Wide II*. Had very hight MTF stats on Photodo (4.2) and is better spec'd that the much more expensive Nikon counterpart. Focuses to around 6inches. Perfect 35mm lens on APS-C DSLR. Autofocuses/meters perfectly on Nikon mount.
Price paid: $60
Additional comments: Hard to find in Quantaray varient but Sigmas don't go for much more.

*EDIT: correction Sigma Super Wide II

5E75H95Jc3G43L83Mbc59331f1307744119b7.jpg
 
Thanks speedfreak... Yes - Super Wide. Pardon my senility?

Any other budget shooters out there with obscure gems to share?
 
It was cheap but seems to be getting more expensive of late:

The Jupiter 3 ... I think I paid around $60.00 for mine a few years ago.

And it's hard to think of that lens without wondering what Brian Sweeny is up to these days?
 
Wow - Speedfreak, thanks again for posting. Looking up a few key words like "Gesamtbewertung" on German->English translation site and having seen a few of these kinda charts before (ahem :) ) not too difficult to figure out this chart. - is this lens, spec-wise anyway, the best "classic" 24mm prime out there? For $60? Very comprehensive test - everything from Leica to Hamminex to Nikon, Minolta, Oly, Yashica, and Soligar and everything in between. Hmmm.
 
Voigtlander Ultron 2/28

It may not be a Summicon-M 2/28 ASPH, but it costs at least six times less and the results are excellent. If Dr. Mandler had designed a 2/28, this may have been what he would have come up with.

I know that some people scream bloody murder about focus shift, but after shooting a few hundred rolls with mine I have yet to see the problem rear its head.

Build quality is excellent. It comes with a low profile metal hood and a focusing tab. Very little intrusion on the M frame lines. For the price you are going to be hard pressed to find a better 2/28mm in M-mount.


Everyone also seems to love the tiny VC 3.5/28. Unfortunately I have not had a chance to shoot one, but it sounds like it was the bargain of the decade when it was in production.
 
Harry - the 28's have always seemed to me to be a kind of neglected focal length on the manufacturer side. Keith - ahhh, the FSU glass. Yes. I have a Jupiter 9, always wanted a "3" but had that base covered.
 
+1 on the VC 28mm, though mine is the 1.9 version...1/10th of a stop quicker than yours ;)

Todd
 
Of course the venerable VC 75/2.5 is another 'budget' lens I couldn't do without! Not to hi-jack the thread but how about some images from these crappy no name lenses? You know, to show what they can do.

Voigtlander 75/2.5
866699947_5a46ee85bb_o.jpg
 
Nikkor 50 1.8. Sharpest 50mm Nikon has ever made. You can buy one brand spankin new, with AF, for 120 clams.
 
Great idea for some pics. Alas, I just got mine a few days ago and only have pictures of potted plants, bananas in a tray, shots of trees from out the window, dishes drying on the dish rack, random household objects - the usual insanely boring stuff when one gets a new lens. But I'll definitely post some "worthy"-ish stuff.
 
Crazy Fedya said:
50mm f/1.4 SMC Takumar. Can be had for under $100.
Click to expand...

I've got one of those too! Radioactive yellowing = nice discount. Just leave it out in the sun for a few days to a week. I can just play with the focus ring on that lens and never take a picture with it and be very happy.
 
NickTrop said:
I've got one of those too! Radioactive yellowing = nice discount. Just leave it out in the sun for a few days to a week. I can just play with the focus ring on that lens and never take a picture with it and be very happy.
Click to expand...

Hahaha, I can do that as well, but images it produces are phenomenal. I have it in 8 element version, that doesn't yellow, and SMC version with rubber focusing ring. Love them both.
 
Keith said:
It was cheap but seems to be getting more expensive of late:

The Jupiter 3 ... I think I paid around $60.00 for mine a few years ago.

And it's hard to think of that lens without wondering what Brian Sweeney is up to these days?
Click to expand...
Maybe that might happen . He is missed. The CZJ 5cm with the old glass is one of my favorites. Mine was made just after the war but I'm sure it had the old glass but who knows. Sure like the lens however.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom