back alley
IMAGES
well a new kit from used gear...
started out with getting the eos m with the 22/2 lens at a pretty good price...
was gifted with a canon ef>m adapter...very nice and a generous gesture from a rff member...
found a really cheap canon ef 40/2.8 lens...
the 22 and the 40 are a nice combo...
kept an eye open for the celebrated canon m 11-22 lens...no luck so far but found a like new real cheap efs 55-250 lens today!!
so i have the eos m body/22/40/55-250 as small/cheap kit so far...
and the light weight zoom balances quite well on the small eos body...
time to break out a bigger bag!!
started out with getting the eos m with the 22/2 lens at a pretty good price...
was gifted with a canon ef>m adapter...very nice and a generous gesture from a rff member...
found a really cheap canon ef 40/2.8 lens...
the 22 and the 40 are a nice combo...
kept an eye open for the celebrated canon m 11-22 lens...no luck so far but found a like new real cheap efs 55-250 lens today!!
so i have the eos m body/22/40/55-250 as small/cheap kit so far...
and the light weight zoom balances quite well on the small eos body...
time to break out a bigger bag!!
fireblade
Vincenzo.
paulfish4570
Veteran
bwahahahahahahahahahaha! ^
back alley
IMAGES
gentlemen...i'm afraid it's all about the bag.
Jason C
Established
May I suggest a Legacy glass selection for your kit:
The Konica Hexanon AR 40mm f/1.8 is small and light, and has some groovy Circle of Confusion (what people would call bokeh) wide open.. The above lens with Fotasy adapter cost me a total of $41.
Konica Hex glass is excellent!
Jason

The Konica Hexanon AR 40mm f/1.8 is small and light, and has some groovy Circle of Confusion (what people would call bokeh) wide open.. The above lens with Fotasy adapter cost me a total of $41.
Konica Hex glass is excellent!
Jason
BillBingham2
Registered User
Is this an unpaid ad for the Gordy Strap?
B2
BillBingham2
Registered User
.....it's all about the bag.
All about the bag, about bag, no tripods.....
I need to get some sleep.....B2 (;->
back alley
IMAGES
May I suggest a Legacy glass selection for your kit:
![]()
The Konica Hexanon AR 40mm f/1.8 is small and light, and has some groovy Circle of Confusion (what people would call bokeh) wide open.. The above lens with Fotasy adapter cost me a total of $41.
Konica Hex glass is excellent!
Jason
i have a hard time understanding the criticism for the looks of the little m body (read elsewhere on the net)...i think it's very attractive...especially with that konica lens on it. but my eyes prefer af these days...even slow af
back alley
IMAGES
All about the bag, about bag, no tripods.....
I need to get some sleep.....B2 (;->
i'm actually tempted to use a monopod with the m plus 55-250 lens...i think it would work out well with that fancy touch screen...
dfatty
Well-known
i always thought the 55-250 was underrated, it's got good IQ, esp for the price, and it's nice and light weight.
i recently tried the canon 85/1.8 on the eos M. i was pleasantly surprised, it focused quickly, smoothly, and accurately, even in relatively low light, and it didn't feel as big as i expected on the body. the canon 50/1.4, which has a rougher version of canon's USM autofocus, isn't nearly as quick or smooth. i shoot canon dslr so i have a bunch of canon lenses, but i would still prefer a set of pancake primes that don't need the adapter, though.
i recently tried the canon 85/1.8 on the eos M. i was pleasantly surprised, it focused quickly, smoothly, and accurately, even in relatively low light, and it didn't feel as big as i expected on the body. the canon 50/1.4, which has a rougher version of canon's USM autofocus, isn't nearly as quick or smooth. i shoot canon dslr so i have a bunch of canon lenses, but i would still prefer a set of pancake primes that don't need the adapter, though.
back alley
IMAGES
i always thought the 55-250 was underrated, it's got good IQ, esp for the price, and it's nice and light weight.
i recently tried the canon 85/1.8 on the eos M. i was pleasantly surprised, it focused quickly, smoothly, and accurately, even in relatively low light, and it didn't feel as big as i expected on the body. the canon 50/1.4, which has a rougher version of canon's USM autofocus, isn't nearly as quick or smooth. i shoot canon dslr so i have a bunch of canon lenses, but i would still prefer a set of pancake primes that don't need the adapter, though.
the m body is absolutely built for pancake primes!
back alley
IMAGES
Joe, what is it about the EOS M you like so much?
small body big sensor...the body plus the pancake 22 is downright tiny, easy to carry and has potential for great images.
the body is solid...lots of metal...
back alley
IMAGES
so i think my kit is done (or almost done...)
eos m body
22
11-22
18-55
and 40efs plus adapter
90flash
if the 50-200 should present itself i might bite if i have the cash on hand but i'm not actively pursuing one...
and it all fits into a tenba dna8 bag!!!
eos m body
22
11-22
18-55
and 40efs plus adapter
90flash
if the 50-200 should present itself i might bite if i have the cash on hand but i'm not actively pursuing one...
and it all fits into a tenba dna8 bag!!!
back alley
IMAGES
DNG
Film Friendly
I don't get why Canon doesn't grow the EOS M faster...
I have a buddy on a another forum who just produces great images from it.. he also loves the 22mm pancake...
I hear a lot of good for this little system camera.
Joe,
Looks like a nice alternative to the Fuji X (I assume you still have).. when you want a bit more compact.
I have a buddy on a another forum who just produces great images from it.. he also loves the 22mm pancake...
I hear a lot of good for this little system camera.
Joe,
Looks like a nice alternative to the Fuji X (I assume you still have).. when you want a bit more compact.
wakarimasen
Well-known
I don't get why Canon doesn't grow the EOS M faster...
I have a buddy on a another forum who just produces great images from it.. he also loves the 22mm pancake...
I hear a lot of good for this little system camera.
Shhhhhhhh! I'm trying to get one from eBay cheap, because they are so bad!
back alley
IMAGES
I don't get why Canon doesn't grow the EOS M faster...
I have a buddy on a another forum who just produces great images from it.. he also loves the 22mm pancake...
I hear a lot of good for this little system camera.
Joe,
Looks like a nice alternative to the Fuji X (I assume you still have).. when you want a bit more compact.
there's another forum out there?
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.