RF_newbie
RF_newbie John
I picked up a B&J 4" f2 Carl Meyer LTM and was curious to hear if anyone has ever used one and the results of that use (insert drum role) or whether i should just give it to the neighbor boys so they can run around burning the asphalt with it 
colyn
ישו משיח
Give it to me so I can burn some pavement with it. 


My experience with B&J optics have been pretty good. I don't why it can't give you good results..
My experience with B&J optics have been pretty good. I don't why it can't give you good results..
ferider
Veteran
I saw one on ebay, about a week ago attached to a Canon body, marked <EP>. Did a bit of research and came up with nothing. But since the Canon 50/0.95 also came in a Meyer version (same optics, different beauty ring), I figured might have been a different incarnation of the Canon 100/2.
Anybody knows about a relation between Canon and Carl Meyer ? Peter ? Thanks,
Roland.
Anybody knows about a relation between Canon and Carl Meyer ? Peter ? Thanks,
Roland.
Last edited:
Al Kaplan
Veteran
Don't do that! I'll take it. Carl Meyer didn't exactly make the finest lenses on the planet but they were useable. It'd be fun to actually use! I have a Leitz LTM to M adapter sitting here awaiting a lens. Actually, it'd be best used on a Canon body with a 100mm frame line in the finder.
ZeissFan
Veteran
Try the lens, and I think that you'll have your answer soon enough. Don't let others make the decision for you. Take some photos and draw your own conclusion.
zeitz
Established
Burke & James sold some lenses from whatever source they could get under the Carl Meyer name, I guess hoping people would get confused with Carl Zeiss and Hugo Meyer. These obviously are both well known trade marks. However, Burke & James also sold off the collection of lenses taked by Gen Patton's 3rd Army from Carl Zeiss in Jena (before Jena was given to the Soviets). So there is some possibility, perhaps remote, that it is a Carl Zeiss lens. Can you post some pictures?
RF_newbie
RF_newbie John

Last edited:
ferider
Veteran
Looks almost identical to a Canon 100/2 to me ....
Roland.

Roland.
zeitz
Established
Wow! I wonder if Canon knew. The Canon 100mm f2.0 is said by many to be better than the 90mm Summicron. You may have an excellent lens.
Rprice
Camera Whore
That should be a good useable lens. I would take off the pringles lens hood though, they have been known to cause vigenetting. 
RF_newbie
RF_newbie John
HAHAHAHThat should be a good useable lens. I would take off the pringles lens hood though, they have been known to cause vigenetting.![]()
RF_newbie
RF_newbie John
Great Help Folks. Thank You all for the input (and laughs).
I am going to go ahead and try it out this weekend. I can hardly wait.
i thought it" looked" pretty nice also, but could find absolutely zero information about this particular f2 LTM . I knew i could probably get the best info on the net right here on RFF
I am going to go ahead and try it out this weekend. I can hardly wait.
i thought it" looked" pretty nice also, but could find absolutely zero information about this particular f2 LTM . I knew i could probably get the best info on the net right here on RFF
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.