Gravatar
Member
Here is the question. SHould I be treating my c-41 black and white film (Kodak CN 400) the same way I do color c-41 films with regards to exposure. In most cases with color, unless the scene is just SUPER contrasty, I expose my film between 2/3 a stop and a full stop over what the scene averaged metering recommends. If is contrast enough I will spot meter of the darkest area with details and expose for 1 to 1 & 1/2 stop less. Sometimes this method gets me in trouble with extreme circumstnces, but I meter this way only 20% of the time anyway. The reason for the over exposure for area exposure has been to get richer colors out of the film especially within the shadows. SHould I be shooting the CN400 at EL 200 for better shadow detail where the scene is tame enough to not require spot metering? Thanks for the advise in advance.
Grav
Grav
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
I'm shooting XP2 at 200 to 250 and can't complain about shadow detail.
Philipp
Philipp
OldNick
Well-known
C-41 has enough lattitude that it is hard to go wrong. I cut the ISA in half, for a while, and now use the printed value. Either way, I got acceptable results.
Jim N.
Jim N.
venchka
Veteran
I just began shooting BW400CN and had the same question. My first roll of XP2 Super was loaded last night. Thanks for the information. So far, I have shot BW400CN at 320 and I have been very pleased. I am easily pleased, by the way.
I was thinking about shooting my next roll at 250. If what y'all and others have said is right, I may go back to 400. I did open up 1 stop for a recent photograph to maintain detail in a shaded porch.
Here are my recent examples, @ 320. Pool table & bass player strictly by the camera meter. Wild Bill's Steak House +1 stop from camera reading.
Here are my recent examples, @ 320. Pool table & bass player strictly by the camera meter. Wild Bill's Steak House +1 stop from camera reading.
Attachments
Share: