Camera beauty contest

L

loneranger

Well-known
Local time
9:14 AM
Joined
Feb 14, 2006
Messages
427
I have owned almost every camera ever made, but none comes close to the physical beauty of the Nikon S3 (and SP). It is not the most comfortable or intuitive camera but in terms of pure beauty, it is the ultimate! Sorry leica, I have decided to dump you.
 
There was a poll about this soome time ago, wasn't there?
To me the Nikons and the Contaxes don't do it. Too cluttered looks. All those knobs at different shapes and heights...
 
Sorry, neithe my d200 nor my wife's Nikon L*** p&s digital qualify as beautifull. My M8, M6ttl, and my R8 beat anything Canon or Nikon can put up to tht table.
 
It's sad no other camera ever came near the simplicity of the CLE.
I guess I like clean lines. Only the on/off knob is designed badly.
 
I'd say the SP is better-looking than the S3, partly because its complex-shaped irregular viewfinder surround frame gives the front a more interesting appearance.

But if we're going to have a camera beauty contest (or even a rangefinder camera beauty contest) we're limiting ourselves drastically if we just debate the merits of the two Nikons vs. Leica models.

For sheer aesthetics, about the Signal Corps model of the Kodak 3a Special? (I'd also be willing to bet this is one camera Loneranger has NOT owned...) I couldn't find a photo of the uber-cool Signal Corps model, but here's a pic (from the George Eastman House) of the plain vanilla 3A; note that this IS a rangefinder camera, in fact the first series-produced example of such...

m197400840114.jpg
 
There was a poll about this soome time ago, wasn't there?
To me the Nikons and the Contaxes don't do it. Too cluttered looks. All those knobs at different shapes and heights...
Click to expand...

The poll wasn't as well put together as it could have been and essentially pitted Leica M models against each other.

The photos above show Contax II and a Nikon S2. Neither have lines as clean as the S3/SP. For example, the Contax is guilty of different sized knobs of different heights, whereas the Nikon S3/SP have a more aestheic balance. Even the S2, if you look at the the photo, has all the heights of its control knobs in balance.
 
f2eyelevel said:
The Nikon S rangefinder cameras family has directly inherited of the refined, minimalist yet extremely modern Art-Deco lines of the original 1936 Contax II.

This might explain.
Click to expand...

Umm, you're missing one picture of the family member :D

519206227_5833229184.jpg
 
cpborello said:
The font of the capital "N" in "Nikon" has always been troubled me.
Click to expand...
Which one?
this one:
attachment.php



Or this one:
attachment.php



Kiu
 

Attachments

  • MVC-008S.JPG
    MVC-008S.JPG
    39 KB · Views: 0
  • MVC-009S.JPG
    MVC-009S.JPG
    39.1 KB · Views: 0
As faithful as I have been to my SP and S2s, alas my roving eyes caught site of another tempting Leica M2 and I picked her up...as this is my second M2 to have owned I was reminded of her charming grace, ease of use and sheer elegance yet again.

I have not used anything else in the last three weeks....woe is me.
 
NIKON KIU said:
Which one?
this one:
Kiu
Click to expand...

The first one (shows my ignorance with the Nikon RFs). I can't say I dislike it per se, that's why I used "troubled". My eye is always drawn to it as "out of the ordinary."

Chris
 
Come on folks,what could be more beautifull than this?

attachment.php


Come-on Fred,show us a picture of a black S2,we'll show 'em:D :p

Kiu
 

Attachments

  • MVC-010S.JPG
    MVC-010S.JPG
    40.4 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
I dont know why contax and nikon S3/SP are put in the same category; They share a similar lens mount but that is the end of their similarity. Leica M3 and MP certainly are beautiful and very refined, but they lack the physical edge, the raw simplicity of the S3/SP. In the SLR world, I would give the honors to the leica SL2.
 
cpborello said:
The first one (shows my ignorance with the Nikon RFs). I can't say I dislike it per se, that's why I used "troubled". My eye is always drawn to it as "out of the ordinary."
Click to expand...

Oh, but that's the beauty of it - it is so perfectly complimented by the small "n". The modern font introduced with the SP is so plain by comparison.

:)
 
Beauty isn't always a cute and cuddlely RF...sometimes it's a big boned SLR...I love the looks of my black body Nikon F2a with MD-2 and 50mm 1.4 attached.
Yeah, it's big but it feels good in my arms...
 
loneranger said:
I have owned almost every camera ever made, but none comes close to the physical beauty of the Nikon S3 (and SP). It is not the most comfortable or intuitive camera but in terms of pure beauty, it is the ultimate! Sorry leica, I have decided to dump you.
Click to expand...

Not the most comfy nor intuitive camera but the most beautiful?

Of course, you are not into photography for photography so I can understand your illogical choice.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom