I have the Elmar-M 50/2.8 and it collapsed perfectly into the R-D1 and I am pretty sure the R-D1 and the R-D1s are the same bodies only with different firmware.
I can't show any sample pictures, I am at work but I used it a lot last week end on trip on an island arround Hong Kong and it gave me very good results.
Max
zoom2zoom said:
max, just want to make sure before i collaspe this lens..
i have the Leitz Elmar 5cm f3.5.. and you collaspe your lens into the R-D1 without any issues?
i tested the summitar and works fine, but i am hesistant to try the Elmar as it looks very close.. just not sure.. anyone have a Elmar 5cm f3.5 on R-D1?
marke said:
1.4" shorter??? Is this a typo? That's quite a difference.
As long as the lens does not protrude into the body more than 20.5mm it is safe to use with the R-D1/1s. Just measure the distance from the flange to the extreme back of the lens when collapsed.
All Elmar 50's tubes have not the same physical length. The one with my M6J (1996) for instance is a bit longer than both my 2004 and 1962 versions.
Also some Elmar's tube may wobble more or less with use and hit the roller cam of the rangefinder which is very close as you can see on this pic.
(M4-2 and 2004 Elmar)
Then if you get the feeling that the tube touches something when you collapse the lens it is most probably the roller cam.
Given the focussing issues some R-D1's do have, my best advice is to refrain from collapsing the lens on the body or, at least, to put a tape or anything else on the tube to reduce wobble but such a protection won't prevent the tube to hit the roller cam if the latter is not perfectly straight or if the tube wobbles to a critical extent anyway.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.