Graybeard
Longtime IIIf User
Spluff, I've used both cameras extensively. You can very easily handhold the Fuji. i've dragged them around the Alps too. As much as i like the big negative for enlargements, the Rollei is much more pleasant and discreet to travel with. At times that is a big consideration.
![]()
Flickr![]()
I've carried Fuji 6x9 rangefinders with me several times in Europe and shot exclusively handholding, with pleasing results. Permit me to offer some comments.
The Fuji cameras are real bricks and can become heavy baggage at the end of a long day (read 8 hours on your feet, daytrip out on a bus or train) remembering that you will need quite a bit a film for a camera(s) that delivers eight frames per roll. I also carry an M6 in my bag with its ammunition. A supportive wife is a real asset here; she knows how to use the Leica.
One might forget the weight of all the gear when you are back home in the darkroom, viewing the negatives for the first time. I have, and do. The supportive lady will enjoy them with you.
More recently I, too, have been using a Rollei E2 (3.5 Xenotar) in place of the Fujis. The Rollei is easier/lighter to carry and to pack when in transit and requires fewer rolls of film for a decent days shooting. I shoot only ASA100 B&W (processed in Mytol) in the Fujis/Rolleis. My maximum enlargement size is a cropped 16x20 and I find that the Rollei negatives are just fine.
Expect to meet many interesting people and have nostalgic conversations when shooting with a Rolleiflex anywhere in Europe. Even a hotel desk clerk had memories to offer.
I expect that I'll continue to use the Rollei on any trip that requires an airline flight (whenever those become practical). For local trips practical by car, I might bring a 5x7. And the Leica.
Good light all-