raid
Dad Photographer
I haven't actually tried it yet, but I have inspected the lens with Canon Adapter B plus a ltm-M adapter to see whether it may be possible to mount it on the M9 without touching the sensor. It seems to be a matter of millimeters here. Has anyone with such a lens and the M9 tried it?
How could I try it (very carefully) without messing up the sensor in case the lens gets too close to it? Does it make a difference if you have the RF version versus the FL version?
Any tips are welcome.
How could I try it (very carefully) without messing up the sensor in case the lens gets too close to it? Does it make a difference if you have the RF version versus the FL version?
Any tips are welcome.
Mackinaw
Think Different
I don't own an M9 or the 19mm Canon, but isn't the flange-back distance the same on all M-series Leicas? Digital or film?
Jim B.
Jim B.
raid
Dad Photographer
This is a good point, Jim. I can use the 19mm lens on Leica film cameras, so based on what you are saying, it should be fine with the M9 too.
Mackinaw
Think Different
That's my guess. If the Canon is OK on a film Leica M, it should be OK on a digital M too.
JIm B.
JIm B.
raid
Dad Photographer
I was told that the J-12 works on the M9, and I just compared the depth of the J-12 with that of the Canon 19, with a Canon P with the back open.
I think, the J-12 gets closer to the film plane than the 19mm lens does, so the 19/3.5 should work fine on the M9 .... hopefully!
I think, the J-12 gets closer to the film plane than the 19mm lens does, so the 19/3.5 should work fine on the M9 .... hopefully!
raid
Dad Photographer
I have tried it now. The lens fits the M9, but there is a lot of vignetting that is blatant. So, the lens should not be used on the M9.
Vince Lupo
Whatever
What do you have your lens detection set to?
raid
Dad Photographer
This is a good point. It was still set for 35mm. I will check it out again.
Gary B
Established
I have been using my Canon 19 LTM on a Leica M8 since the camera first came out and am having no problems. You might run into problems with fringing on the edges and corners of the frames that is caused be the rear element being so close to the sensor that light does not enter the sensor at right angles.
I would like to see your results. Please.
I would like to see your results. Please.
raid
Dad Photographer
Gary,
The M8 crops 33.33% off the image, so the vignetting portions of the full image will not show. I will upload some results.
The M8 crops 33.33% off the image, so the vignetting portions of the full image will not show. I will upload some results.
raid
Dad Photographer
There is strong vignetting.




Roger Hicks
Veteran
Dear Raid,
Strong and apparently asymmetrical vignetting?
Cheers,
R.
Strong and apparently asymmetrical vignetting?
Cheers,
R.
raid
Dad Photographer
Hello Roger,
What does such asymmetrical vignetting suggest to you? The M9 works fine with other lenses.
There is also some red banding.
What does such asymmetrical vignetting suggest to you? The M9 works fine with other lenses.
There is also some red banding.
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Dear Raid,Hello Roger,
What does such asymmetrical vignetting suggest to you? The M9 works fine with other lenses.
There is also some red banding.
Dunno. Off centre mounting, maybe? I've never seen anything quite like it. All suggestions gratefully received!
Cheers,
R.
kbg32
neo-romanticist
Your example does not look that sharp Raid. The asymmetrical vignetting could be internal elements out of alignment. My old 21/3.4 Super Angulon vignetted evenly around the frame.
Is there a light baffle around the rear element?
Is there a light baffle around the rear element?
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.