kermaier
Well-known
I received my Canon 50/3.5. It's a very late example -- probably from the last year of production, 1955 -- in nice condition. It's a beautifully machined, very compact lens which, by the way, collapses very nicely on my R-D1 (as opposed to the various Elmar 50/3.5 versions which, I understand, do not).
Now I'm going about experimenting with the lens to see how it draws and at which apertures and distances it's good. Alas, it appears to focus somewhat behind where the rangefinder indicates. For example, using the oblique bookshelf testing method, if I'm focused at 4 feet, the actual sharpest focus is about 5-6 feet. (I haven't tried at farther focus distances yet.)
Is this the sort of thing that can be readily corrected by a good service shop?
::Ari
Now I'm going about experimenting with the lens to see how it draws and at which apertures and distances it's good. Alas, it appears to focus somewhat behind where the rangefinder indicates. For example, using the oblique bookshelf testing method, if I'm focused at 4 feet, the actual sharpest focus is about 5-6 feet. (I haven't tried at farther focus distances yet.)
Is this the sort of thing that can be readily corrected by a good service shop?
::Ari
Last edited: