Canon 50f1.8 chrome

[photo4ls]

Just ordered a 50 f1.8 chrome Canon lens and I would
like for anyone familiar w/this lens to give some feed back
and maybe post some photos from this lens. I plan to
use it on an M3.

Nelson

 

[cjm]

It's an excellent lens.

Here is a recent thread.

Sample:

 

[photo4ls]

Thanks Chris,
I think I remember that thread and I was wondering if it was the same as the black and silver 1.8 optically.

Nelson

 

[cjm]

I *believe* they are the same optics. I have the chrome version, which I think looks better. 🙂

 

[photo4ls]

Chris you just answered my question. That
is exactly the one I ordered (chrome). Hopefully
I can get some images as good as yours 😉and to
get a different look from the 50 summicron that I
have been using

Nelson

 

[cjm]

Thanks. Here's what it will look like (except with your M3).

 

[photo4ls]

Thanks again Chris, I think I'm going to like
the looks of this combo.
Nelson

 

[bennyng]

Congrats on your purchase! I'm waiting for mine chrome one in the mail too!

I've always been a sucker for these vintage looking chrome finishes. And they all feel very solidly built due to their weight.

Do share some pictures when you get yours!

Cheers,

 

[harry01562]

I'm fortunate enough to own 1 Serenar chrome, 3 Canon chrome and 1 Canon black lenses. They are all excellent performers.

According to Peter Kitchingman's new book on Canon lenses, they are all the same formula and coating. The black lenses are quite a bit lighter, but many prefer the heavier chrome mount. Serenar was the first name given to the Canon lenses, but all are 1st quality, regardless of age. The coating is hard, unlike the early Leica lenses. Small cleaning marks (a euphemism for scratches) on the front element has basically no effect on images.

The lens looks good and handles well on an M3, or any of the several Canon RF models. The Canon P is frequently touted as a poor man's Leica M, and is a beautifully made camera, with a full opening back and variable VF as bonuses.

If you get involved with the lenses, the book mentioned is a solid investment in any future purchases, and top quality in content and execution. Spoken as a very satisfied owner, with no other interest financially in the book. There is a good thread in this forum on the book.

Harry

 

[januaryman]

Love this lens! I have a set on it in Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/januaryman/sets/72157605289886060/

Here it is on my M2:

 

[photo4ls]

50f1.8

50f1.8

Januaryman,
I like your flickr shots that you posted, have
you shot any others in lowlight ?

 

[Bingley]

I have the later chrome and black version of this lens, and it's a winner. These were shot as the sun was setting on this year's California State Fair:

 

[Michael I.]

http://sushiisyumi.blogspot.com/search/label/canon 50/1.8 chrome
I like it

 

[payasam]

Used a Serenar 50/1.8 for 17 years on an M3 and a Canon VT Deluxe. Dependable, predictable lens.

 

[photo4ls]

Has anyone using this lens seen the need for a
hood, Canon or generic.

 

[monochromejrnl]

i use it primarily with a hood but results have been good without one as well (though i haven't used one 'naked' in flare inducing situations)...

 

[Bingley]

Dan on '66 -- Thank you!

Re: the OP's follow-up question regarding a hood: I've generally used one on mine (either generic or original) although I'm not convinced it's really necessary. The lens seems pretty flare-resistent

 

[photo4ls]

Monochromejml & Bingley,
Thanks for the info, like your photos Bingley.

Nelson

 

[photo4ls]

Canon 50 f1.8 chrome

Canon 50 f1.8 chrome

Just got a visit from the postman w/my Canon
50 1.8 lens. Just as I was told, KEH seems to rate
their gear conservative. Lens looks good and clean.
Just waiting for the postman to visit again w/my ltm
adapter. Will post something as soon as i get everything
togather.

Nelson

 

[Bingley]

Nelson -- Congrats on the lens, and thanks for the comment. Looking forward to seeing your shots.