Canon LTM Canon 50mm f/1.8 RF lens

Canon M39 M39 screw mount bodies/lenses

colyn

ישו משיח
Local time
6:50 PM
Joined
May 31, 2006
Messages
4,532
Is this rangefinder lens as good as some say it is?
According to the Canon website there are 3 versions of it. One chrome and 2 black. How do you tell which is which or the better one??
 
Last edited:
as far as I know the primary difference in the versions is cosmetic/ergonomic. All have 6 elements in 4 groups.

The chrome one is earliest - very fine. 1.8-22, 10 aperture blades. (I own this one)

Black vII - 1.8-22, 9 aperture blades.

Black vIII - 1.8-16, 9 aperture blades.
 
Hi,

it is a really great all purpose sharp lens.
I have an chrome serenar and love it, though it id underutilized.

Ciao

Joerg
 
rogue_designer said:
as far as I know the primary difference in the versions is cosmetic/ergonomic. All have 6 elements in 4 groups.

The chrome one is earliest - very fine. 1.8-22, 10 aperture blades. (I own this one)

Black vII - 1.8-22, 9 aperture blades.

Black vIII - 1.8-16, 9 aperture blades.

I must be getting sleepy.. I didn't notice the difference is minimum aperture..:bang:
 
Joerg said:
Hi,

it is a really great all purpose sharp lens.
I have an chrome serenar and love it, though it id underutilized.

Ciao

Joerg

For the time being I'm using my Leica Summarit f/1.5 lens on my Canon P. I bid and won a vII black on the &%#@*bay then won the Canon hood to go with it on another auction..
 
I own a Canon 50mm f/1.8 Chrome as well, I really love it.

This is one of the shots taken on Delta 3200.

graves3.jpg


It seems rather sharp too. Albeit on the heavy side, but that matches the weight of my Canon P :p
 
I really like this lens. Here are a couple of recent examples, shot at f2.8, on Portra 160NC:
 

Attachments

  • Ellen 120906small.jpg
    Ellen 120906small.jpg
    418.4 KB · Views: 0
  • Ellen & Quincy1 small.jpg
    Ellen & Quincy1 small.jpg
    441.5 KB · Views: 0
rogue_designer said:
as far as I know the primary difference in the versions is cosmetic/ergonomic. All have 6 elements in 4 groups.

The chrome one is earliest - very fine. 1.8-22, 10 aperture blades. (I own this one)

Black vII - 1.8-22, 9 aperture blades.

Black vIII - 1.8-16, 9 aperture blades.

?? I have a chrome 1.8-16 (NOT 22), 10 aperture blades !?!


Oh, and also counted the blades on my black, 1.8-22: 8 blades?? Are we talking about the same lenses??
 
Last edited:
HuubL said:
?? I have a chrome 1.8-16 (NOT 22), 10 aperture blades !?!


Oh, and also counted the blades on my black, 1.8-22: 8 blades?? Are we talking about the same lenses??

How odd - I was using the Canon Museum's information - but double checking my chrome - it is a 10 blade, 1.8-16 as well. My apologies. I don't own any of the black versions to double check those. Perhaps there was variation between the Serenar and Canon named versions?
 
colyn said:
I must be getting sleepy.. I didn't notice the difference is minimum aperture..:bang:
same here!!!

I have both black one. Can someone give me a good reason for not getting a chrome one, please. I always want a chrome.
 
I have tested mine [chrome version] many times in my tests of 50mm lenses, and each time RFF members pick out the images taken by it as excellent images. I have never let me down. It simply is not an "exiting" lens, but you get a 50mm lens that is made extremely well and with great optics at a rather low price. It is an excellent lens for scenics and for portraits since it is sharp across the image and not like a Sonnar design lens. At the same time, it is not surgically sharp, showing the microscopic pimples on peoples' faces.


Raid
 
Now I've counted almost 5 times now, but my chrome 50mm f/1.8 has 11 blades.

Correction, 10.

Mine got some oil like substance on the blade, so I just picked one with the biggest ammount, and just use that as the starting point on the count.
 
Last edited:
stesm said:
Most of mine display signs of improper cleaning (150 grit sandpaper?) or other faults, but two are in good condition and I plan to keep and use them.
This thread made me realize how many 50's are laying about. Anyone need a body cap? There's also a couple of Jupiters and a Summicron... somewhere...

I'd be happy to releive you of one of the gritty Canon body caps... :D Should I just PM you my address and await my Christmas present? :angel:

William
 
Chrome - but it's not here with me so I can't fuss over blades, etc. Here it is wide open (Delta100 at 80ISO in Diafine):
 

Attachments

  • cooperhand.jpg
    cooperhand.jpg
    341.8 KB · Views: 0
If you visit my earlier threads on comparing 50mm lenses you will see that the chrome Serenar 50mm/1.8 did very well against more expensive 50mm lenses.

Raid
 
Back
Top Bottom