BillCB
Member
I have been using a Canon 7s with three lenses. The rangefinder is accurate with the 50 mm 1.4 and the 35 mm 2.0. The pix are sharp at full aperture, and looking at ground glass at the film plane with a 15x magnifier confirms the rangefinder's focussing.
However, when I mount the f0.95 it's a different story. The rangefinder becomes coincident at about 60 ft with a subject at infinity. Or, at a measured 6 ft the rangefinder wants me to focus at about 5.5 ft.
I have deduced that the distance scale on the lens IS accurate. If I focus at infinity for a far-distant subject, it is sharp. If I focus at 6 ft for a subject at 6 ft, it is sharp. This would imply that the rangefinder needs adjusting. But if I adjust it, it throws out the focus for the other two lenses.
What gives? The implication is that the cam on the 0.95 lens is "off" in some way. Can anyone help? As I say, the lens markings are right, the rangefinder on the other lenses is right - what gives?
Bill
However, when I mount the f0.95 it's a different story. The rangefinder becomes coincident at about 60 ft with a subject at infinity. Or, at a measured 6 ft the rangefinder wants me to focus at about 5.5 ft.
I have deduced that the distance scale on the lens IS accurate. If I focus at infinity for a far-distant subject, it is sharp. If I focus at 6 ft for a subject at 6 ft, it is sharp. This would imply that the rangefinder needs adjusting. But if I adjust it, it throws out the focus for the other two lenses.
What gives? The implication is that the cam on the 0.95 lens is "off" in some way. Can anyone help? As I say, the lens markings are right, the rangefinder on the other lenses is right - what gives?
Bill