Sonnar2
Well-known
Very nice pics, Krosya.
It looks to me that the 58/1.2 is better than common saying.
I'm a big fan of the 58mm focal length. Very useful at events or festivals.
Yes, the FL lenses were heavyweights. This is true for the first FD series as well. My chrom nose 50/1.4 FD is heavier than any other 50/1.4 I have including the NIKON. And my 55/1.2 FD might be heavier than the 50/0.95 RF.
It looks to me that the 58/1.2 is better than common saying.
I'm a big fan of the 58mm focal length. Very useful at events or festivals.
Yes, the FL lenses were heavyweights. This is true for the first FD series as well. My chrom nose 50/1.4 FD is heavier than any other 50/1.4 I have including the NIKON. And my 55/1.2 FD might be heavier than the 50/0.95 RF.
Last edited:
Krosya
Konicaze
Thank you. I think some lenses may be in poor condition and that is why the so-so reputation. Mine is a clean one.
David Murphy
Veteran
It's one of the prettiest lenses ever made - simply an awesome piece of glass metal engineering. That said I have found the 55mm F1.2 FL sharper wide open. I love them both!
Xherion
Member
Nice pics Krosya!
Anybody has ever done a comparison between FL 58/1.2 , FL 55/1.2, FD 50/1.2?
Interested in one of these to use with NEX.
Also how much are those lenses costing one of these days?
Anybody has ever done a comparison between FL 58/1.2 , FL 55/1.2, FD 50/1.2?
Interested in one of these to use with NEX.
Also how much are those lenses costing one of these days?
Sonnar2
Well-known
FD 55/1.2 ASPHERICAL on a NEX here: http://www.systemkamera-forum.de/sony-nex-objektive/11657-canon-fd-55-1-2-aspherical.html
filmfan
Well-known
Here are a few of my shots with the FL 58mm f/1.2 (all shot wide open):
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.