Stephen G
Well-known
I have not been a home printer in many years, and instead been a longtime mpix customer.
Annually, I seem to reconsider this when the usual Canon printer rebate season pops up.
Currently, I can get- Canon Pixma Pro 100 + 50 sheets of 13x19 luster + 50 sheets of 13x19 glossy, all-in for under $200 after rebates.
I have read some reviews. Many seem to be imply its performance is very close to the Pixma Pro 1, for half the price (or in this case, 1/5th the price).
Some inadequacies indicated:
* Its not so good for matte
* Its got 8 inks instead of 10 or 12
* Its got dye instead of pigment ink (shorter life, but more glossy color)
* Less printer nozzles per ink (though smaller droplets..)
Am I missing a glaring flaw here, or is this essentially a great buy at the moment?
I'm happy to keep using Mpix if I am going to get inferior results home printing with this printer.
Do dye prints, or inkjet prints in general, still require more care when handling than a standard lab print?
Not sure how big a deal dye vs pigment really is for life span in real life usage.. (considering I have lab prints that faded/stained due to poor lab handling).
My use case-
* Not a terribly frequent printer, though if I had one in-home, I'd print say.. at least monthly as I know printers need exercise.
* Printing smaller size by the dozen for my wife regularly.
* Frequent printer of 12x18 size for my walls & give away
* Similarly like to print other non-standard sizes like 8x12 or 6x9 for give away
* Kind of excited by the idea of more iterative printing if I have my own printer
Annually, I seem to reconsider this when the usual Canon printer rebate season pops up.
Currently, I can get- Canon Pixma Pro 100 + 50 sheets of 13x19 luster + 50 sheets of 13x19 glossy, all-in for under $200 after rebates.
I have read some reviews. Many seem to be imply its performance is very close to the Pixma Pro 1, for half the price (or in this case, 1/5th the price).
Some inadequacies indicated:
* Its not so good for matte
* Its got 8 inks instead of 10 or 12
* Its got dye instead of pigment ink (shorter life, but more glossy color)
* Less printer nozzles per ink (though smaller droplets..)
Am I missing a glaring flaw here, or is this essentially a great buy at the moment?
I'm happy to keep using Mpix if I am going to get inferior results home printing with this printer.
Do dye prints, or inkjet prints in general, still require more care when handling than a standard lab print?
Not sure how big a deal dye vs pigment really is for life span in real life usage.. (considering I have lab prints that faded/stained due to poor lab handling).
My use case-
* Not a terribly frequent printer, though if I had one in-home, I'd print say.. at least monthly as I know printers need exercise.
* Printing smaller size by the dozen for my wife regularly.
* Frequent printer of 12x18 size for my walls & give away
* Similarly like to print other non-standard sizes like 8x12 or 6x9 for give away
* Kind of excited by the idea of more iterative printing if I have my own printer