MikeMGB
Well-known
I haven't used this film for about 18 years, I'm looking forward to running a roll on Saturday and seeing what I can do with it.
The Canon rangefinder seems like the ideal camera for it, I won't be looking through the red filter like on an SLR, but the meter is behind the filter so I won't need to compensate for it.

The Canon rangefinder seems like the ideal camera for it, I won't be looking through the red filter like on an SLR, but the meter is behind the filter so I won't need to compensate for it.

BLKRCAT
75% Film
beware that SFX isn't a true IR film and you may not get the full IR effect with just a red filter.
MikeMGB
Well-known
beware that SFX isn't a true IR film and you may not get the full IR effect with just a red filter.
I know that, I just like the very high contrast and grain I used to be able to get from this film.
BLKRCAT
75% Film
have fun with it
emayoh
Established
Heck yah. I like where you're going with this and want to see the results!
charjohncarter
Veteran
I shoot SFX with a Red Filter, at 32 E.I., develop in HC-110h I think 18 minutes (If you care PM me). I've been using SFX for the same reason you are. I don't like IR and this is really a different look.
SFX200 HC-110h by John Carter, on Flickr
SFX200 HC-110h by John Carter, on Flickr
I don't like it for portraits (it wasn't intended for portraits, but I tried it).
Ilford SFX by John Carter, on Flickr


I don't like it for portraits (it wasn't intended for portraits, but I tried it).

MikeMGB
Well-known
Thank you for the comments, John, those photos are awesome.
I'll be spending Saturday at a classic car show, in a wooded park, next to a lake, I can't think of a better setting to try this roll.
I'll be spending Saturday at a classic car show, in a wooded park, next to a lake, I can't think of a better setting to try this roll.
charjohncarter
Veteran
I sent you a PM, and I agree that would be a perfect setting.
Huss
Veteran
This one is great.
MikeMGB
Well-known
charjohncarter
Veteran
They came out well, did you meter through the filter? I think I told you I am shooting a 32 EI for this film, and from the looks of your filter I think mine might be a little darker Red. I use a hand meter because I read someplace the CDS meters do not read red well. I found this to be true with some of my SLRs/
MikeMGB
Well-known
I used a hand-held meter and the TTL meter and compared the two. The camera meter tended to overexpose by one stop, after taking the filter into account. Now I know I can rely on the camera's meter somewhat, I just need to adjust the ISO to compensate.
Which filter are you using? I have a Tiffen 25.
Thanks again for your advice, it was a great starting point!
Which filter are you using? I have a Tiffen 25.
Thanks again for your advice, it was a great starting point!
gb hill
Veteran
These really look cool. I'd like to shoot some of this film sometime.
charjohncarter
Veteran
This one is great.
Thanks....
charjohncarter
Veteran
I used a hand-held meter and the TTL meter and compared the two. The camera meter tended to overexpose by one stop, after taking the filter into account. Now I know I can rely on the camera's meter somewhat, I just need to adjust the ISO to compensate.
Which filter are you using? I have a Tiffen 25.
Thanks again for your advice, it was a great starting point!
My red filter has B+W 090 5x written on it, it looks darker than some other red filters I have BUT not as dark as the deep red ones. I figured 2 1/3 to 2 2/3 stops. But with my personal adjustment I figured 200 down to 32 EI.
EDIT: I was lucky with this film (for once), I started out with this one filter and guess at EI 40. The negatives were beautiful but I dropped it to 32 EI the next roll. I never have had any luck with Red filters on CDS cell meters (and even Orange filters), and that is why I use a handheld and adjust down the EI. Someone here years ago said that the CDS cells have a sensitivity that is not compatible with red light. Chris101 was right.
MikeMGB
Well-known
According to Dr. Google your filter is a 5x, mine is a 8x, I have no idea what that means and I don't think it matters much, I believe technique is more important than depth of red. I still need to fine tune my technique to get the best out of this film.
My next film I'm going to run through my Leica IIIA with a Summar lens, I get the feeling this uncoated lens will produce interesting results. I've just ordered a red filter and adapter ring for it.
My next film I'm going to run through my Leica IIIA with a Summar lens, I get the feeling this uncoated lens will produce interesting results. I've just ordered a red filter and adapter ring for it.
charjohncarter
Veteran
I just looked up filter factors, I haven't used them since the 60s. But my five looks like about 2.5 stop reduction. And the 8x is a 3 stop reduction. So you can't be far off even though the numbers seem like more. When I get a filter which I haven't for years I figure the reduction in EI (ISO) and then use that on my handheld meter to get exposure.
MikeMGB
Well-known
I just looked up filter factors, I haven't used them since the 60s. But my five looks like about 2.5 stop reduction. And the 8x is a 3 stop reduction. So you can be far off even though the numbers seem like more. When I get a filter which I haven't for years I figure the reduction in EI (ISO) and then use that on my handheld meter to get exposure.
I'll certainly be using a handheld meter with the Leica, I'm glad you looled up the filter factors, it'll help, thank you.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.