benlees
Well-known
The elephant in the room is the quality of smartphone pictures: they are very good. Not as good as a dedicated camera, but obviously good enough- and getting better faster than their dedicated counterparts.
Calzone
Gear Whore #1
Bill,
Call me antisocial, even though my gal is a celib and digital influencer who did a TED Talk and even won a "Shorty Award" in the fashion catagory against Victoria Beckham recently, I don't do any Social Media, nor do I even text.
"Maggie" pays for a flip phone, and pretty much I leave it at home and use it as an answering machine. For me the world would be a better place without cellphones. All these distracted people, and the amount of car accidents and fatalities are increasing.
New cars are safer than ever, and I say the increase in accidents and fatalities are mostly due to distracted driving. Here in NYC on the street I see a culture of limited attention span, short sightedness, and people not aware of their surroundings. I hate to use the word, but I will use the word "clueless."
My gal, a PhD academic college professor, can't function without being wired. Something like walking in NYC gets complicated because she is so hyperstimulated, distracted, and relies on her phone as a lifestyle.
One thing I learned from my gal though is that if you want to stand out, don't do what everybody else is doing. Four years ago the only digital camera I owned was the Leica Monochrom, and doing a Fashion Blog in all black and white was novel (actually pretty hard to do). Her blog got lots of attention because of all the B&W only photography.
That is why I print (Piezography), still shoot film that I will wet print one day, don't scan, don't post photography... I'm cool with being an outsider. Again anti-social behavior...
Canon also makes printers: not many photographers print anymore. Printers or photographers who print are kinda rare. My guess is that perhaps less than 10 percent of photogs on RFF print. Most photographs remain just files or are just posted on the Internet.
For me my images are for printing large where image quality really counts. Big prints don't lie. A computer screen, even a calibrated 27 inch EIZO, cannot show or display what I captured. I basically can print what I can't see on my EIZO, even in a dim room with the contrast lowered to 50 Lux.
Cal
ptpdprinter
Veteran
I hate to burst your bubble, but given the frequency and length of your posts on RFF, you can't remotely be deemed anti-social. You head up the monthly NYC meet-ins for goodness sake.
Emile de Leon
Well-known
Everything has its beginning...middle..and end...cameras too..
Think Kodak..
Think Kodak..
Calzone
Gear Whore #1
PTP,
Many times in life I have stood alone. The persona I present here on RFF is not really me. In real life, even though I live in NYC surrounded by millions, I basically am a loner and always have been.
It is true that I have many posts here, but realize I only registered on RFF perhaps in 2007, so divide my amount of posting over a twelve year period and the amount of posting is not that high.
I am cursed that I stand out in a crowd. I also have this tendency/talent to bring out either the good or the bad in people, but I assure you that even though I can be very-very social, I am happiest when I'm alone.
Back when Ronald Ray-Gun was President, I worked at Los Alamos on one of his "Star Wars" projects, a Neutral Partical Beam Weapon prototype that was to be space based, to shoot down Intercontinental Ballistic Missles in their boost phase before they vaporize us.
I did a Henry David Thourogh and lived in a log cabin 47 miles from civilization in the Santa Fe National Forest. My cabin was so remote that I got no TV reception. The small community I lived in was just 80 mailboxes on State Highway 4. Most people do not understand or know peace like I do. Not many know what it is truely like to be alone.
Cal
David Hughes
David Hughes
They could always start making film cameras; I gather that's booming fttb...
Regards, David
Regards, David
John Lawrence
Well-known
Dogman
Veteran
I would speculate that the sales of film cameras today are a fraction of the sales of digital cameras. And digital camera sales are probably less than sales of smart phones.
Huss
Veteran
I would speculate that your speculation is correct.
Huss
Veteran
Once a mfg tries to sell an m43 camera for $3000 we will know that digi cam sales are
doomed.
doomed.
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
To see the outlook you need to know about the gear. How it is used.
Obviosly Canonikon is not going to sell cameras in large quantities as it was before decent cameras in the phones.
But it is impossible to replace cameras with mobiles.
In various applications.
Canon also makes cameras for motion pictures and broadcasts, news, production.
In December I was in one of oldest USA college.
They have racks and shelves stuffed with Canon cameras. Because Canon is also the service.
Obviosly Canonikon is not going to sell cameras in large quantities as it was before decent cameras in the phones.
But it is impossible to replace cameras with mobiles.
In various applications.
Canon also makes cameras for motion pictures and broadcasts, news, production.
In December I was in one of oldest USA college.
They have racks and shelves stuffed with Canon cameras. Because Canon is also the service.
chipgreenberg
Well-known
Calzone
Gear Whore #1
Ted Striker
Well-known
No, they didn't. Not like this. Film cameras continued to evolve and improve up until the end. The Nikon F6 and Canon 1V were absolutely at the top of the line, better than cameras before them. Today we see the tiniest iterations between digital cameras and as a result, few buy them and sales decline.
During the film era, camera companies had the moms, pops, and uncle bob's to sell mass market cameras too, to boost profits.
Today they have none of that, all lost to cell phones.
As a result, prices have to rise significantly to replace that lost revenue. People such as myself simply stopped buying new camera gear. The costs are too high. If I buy (and I rarely do) it's used gear, not new.
I think Canon's CEO is spot on when he sees massive declines in the future. I rarely ever see cameras that are not cell phones. No one buys anymore. I go to my two kids school events and never is there a camera. I stopped bringing my own cameras because I was tired of sticking out in the crowd. Now I just use my iPhone X to photograph my kids.
The battle against the cell phone has been lost. Canon, Nikon, Sony, and the tiny players cannot replace the lost revenue from the mass consumer. They are gone and never coming back.
Ted Striker
Well-known
Considering that there's next to no new film cameras actually available for purchase, that's not a risky prediction.
jszokoli
Well-known
The second quote sums up what I think will happen. Cameras for casual use will all but disappear. This will be a huge shake up for the industry. There will no longer be a big consumer base to support the pro level equipment development.
This will lead to the almost unthinkable, an inversion where Leica's prices will look reasonable. Cannon and Nikon will be the outsiders without the knowledge to make high quality products on a shoe string like Leica. Now I hear the gasps but that's what Leica does, it has no base of other products or consumer models to support their product development.
So get ready for Leica prices on the cameras that will be left...
Joe
This will lead to the almost unthinkable, an inversion where Leica's prices will look reasonable. Cannon and Nikon will be the outsiders without the knowledge to make high quality products on a shoe string like Leica. Now I hear the gasps but that's what Leica does, it has no base of other products or consumer models to support their product development.
So get ready for Leica prices on the cameras that will be left...
Joe
Ted Striker
Well-known
Agree 100%. Canon know what they are talking about. I have seen the same as you as I travel, as has Canon's CEO. He knows that they have lost the mass consumer, forever.
Canon is also a big name in printers. No one prints anymore. It's been many, many years since anyone has shown me a print of one of their photos. It's always on the phone or computer.
Canon's printer sales are surely dying just as their camera sales are.
HHPhoto
Well-known
Your speculation is not quite correct.
Here are the sales numbers:
- In 2017 about 25 million digital cameras have been sold.
And a bit more than 8 million film cameras.
- In 2018 a bit less than 20 million digital cameras have been sold.
And about 10 million film cameras. In both years most of the sold film cameras have been instant film cameras (instax and Polaroid).
Cheers, Jan
HHPhoto
Well-known
That is a myth spread only in photo forums. Has nothing to do with reality.
There are more than a dozen big factories for photo paper globally.
The photo paper market has a volume of more than 400 million m² p.a.
It's a huge market.
Cheers, Jan
p.giannakis
Pan Giannakis
That is quite interesting. Do you know what other cameras are still in production and have been taken into account?