David_Manning
Well-known
Thought I'd share these two recent shots of my daughter Skylar fishing in Florida last week. She didn't catch anything, but we had nice father-daughter time together.
M6 classic, Zeiss 35/2 Biogon, Kodak BW400CN, Walmart scans (!)...
M6 classic, Zeiss 35/2 Biogon, Kodak BW400CN, Walmart scans (!)...


MCTuomey
Veteran
classic zeiss look. i hate to say it, because so many have said it before, but yes there's that "3D" feel, esp #1. nice combo, the biogon and the BW400CN, i think.
thanks for sharing.
thanks for sharing.
clicker
Well-known
Very nice indeed. The Zeiss 35mm is a beautiful lens and marries nicely with the Leica.
Thanks for the posting.
Thanks for the posting.
David_Manning
Well-known
I forgot to mention that I shot both at 200ISO. I've been successfully changing ISOs on the fly with this film, from 200-800 with great success. The flexibility has really made it my go-to film for day-to-day shooting with the M6.
David_Manning
Well-known
By the way, found this on NYTimes Lens blog. The shooter is using a Leica and 35mm lens. Proves once again that simple is not always bad.
http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/22/showcase-96/?hp
http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/22/showcase-96/?hp
David_Manning
Well-known
Thanks for the looks and commentary. Where the heck are my manners?
toyfel
Established
The second one is wonderful! The first one is very good too! (IMHO it would benefit from a tighter crop, less sky on top)
The fun you two had fishing together really shows in the pics!
The fun you two had fishing together really shows in the pics!
Roberto V.
Le surrèalisme, c'est moi
So, you rated it at 200-800 and got it developed normally at walmart? I'm using the same film for day to day shooting also and it's been good so far.
Roberto V.
Le surrèalisme, c'est moi
Awesome pictures by the way
David_Manning
Well-known
Thanks again everybody.
Roberto, yes, I rated it between 200-800 ISO during shooting and just processed normally at Walmart. I'm sure their scanner/printer compensated (just as I would during printing). This emulsion gets very contrasty at 800 though. It's best at 200, which is what these pictures were exposed at.
Roberto, yes, I rated it between 200-800 ISO during shooting and just processed normally at Walmart. I'm sure their scanner/printer compensated (just as I would during printing). This emulsion gets very contrasty at 800 though. It's best at 200, which is what these pictures were exposed at.
Roberto V.
Le surrèalisme, c'est moi
Thanks again everybody.
Roberto, yes, I rated it between 200-800 ISO during shooting and just processed normally at Walmart. I'm sure their scanner/printer compensated (just as I would during printing). This emulsion gets very contrasty at 800 though. It's best at 200, which is what these pictures were exposed at.
Nice, I'll try that after I run out of Plus-x. Thanks for the tip.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.