Zenjitsuman
Established
With the Nikon LS-5000 can you scan longer panoramic 35mm based film like Xpan, Horizon and Noblex 35mm? These are essentially two 35mm frames wide shot on regular 35mm film.
Zenjitsuman said:With the Nikon LS-5000 can you scan longer panoramic 35mm based film like Xpan, Horizon and Noblex 35mm? These are essentially two 35mm frames wide shot on regular 35mm film.
Which Vuescan version are you using? The accuracy of the stepper for the strips was improved in Vuescan [FONT=Comic Sans MS, Arial]8.4.55, see http://www.hamrick.com/vuescan/vuescan.htm#changesJTK said:I use a Nikon V with both Nikonscan and Vuescan. They're both great, but Nikonscan's better with 6 frame unmounted strips because it drives the motorized carrier more accurately (with expensive accessories, 5000 can handle whole uncut rolls). Vuescan can be adjusted with more subtlety, which isn't necessarily a big advantage. Vuescan's Infared and Nikonscan's Ice are equally good.
Fuji Astia is incredibly high resolution and has virtually no grain, scanned with Nikon V at 4000ppi and enlarged to 12X18. Fuji Neopan 400, rated at 800 with R-09 is gorgeous at 12X18 (neutral black due to Quadtone). Printing with Epson 2200, OEM pigments using Quadtone.
I use a Nikon 5000 with Vuescan. I'm very happy with the image quality, but the real benefit is the improvement to my workflow. The 5000 is very fast, and with a little "tinkering", it can be made to scan an entire roll without the roll film adapter. You simply set the exposure based on the film being used, hit scan and walk away. Comeback about a half hour later and you've got both RAW and JPEG scans for 36 exposures. I use the JPEGs for proofs, and I use the RAWs for anything worth spending time on. If you like to scan entire rolls, I highly recommend this scanner.
pevelg said:What is this "tinkering" that you are speaking of I ask? Can you enlighten me, as I really don't want to spend more money to buy the adapter!!! 😀
lns said:The Nikon software is not yet compatible with Leopard, according to various internet sources. Nikon has said it will fix this, but hasn't yet. Silverfast (which is pricey) works with Leopard now.
I only know because I've been looking into it, too.
JTK said:Quinn...
Have you had any grief at all with your scanner following this modification? Any special tricks other than the modification?
What do you think about the suggestion, made elsewhere, of a switch instead of hard-wired connection?
ZebGoesZeiss said:Well, I'm on Leopard (OS X 10.5.2) and using Nikon Scan 4. No problems so far. I actually didn't think about it when I purchased the scanner two weeks ago. Anyway, no problems at all. In fact, it runs better than some programs that are (supposedly) supported... 😀