mutikonka
Member
After several weeks of procrastinating, I have decided to take my Leica IIIa to China as my main camera for a trekking trip around Kham. I expect to be using it mostly with an Elmar 35/3.5, which I find is the most useful focal length for my mix of landscapes and people pics (and I love the retro look images it produces). I will also be taking a 50/2.8 Elmar for portraits and a Canon 28/2.8 for landscape work. The reason I settled on the Leica IIIa over my Leica R7 was size - the whole kit fits easily in my jacket pockets, carried in snap lock plastic bags. My Leica R7 is technically way ahead, of course, but there's no way I could carry the body and three lenses around and have them 'handy' when those sudden picture opportunities arise.
I also thought about bringing my Leica IIIg but decided I didn't want to risk it in the mountains or in the guesthouses there ... if I lose the IIIa it's not TOO painful to replace. And maybe it's just my model, but the IIIa feels just a bit more solid than the IIIg.
The other advantage of using the IIIa is that I won't need to worry about batteries for it. The disadvantage is that the flash options are very limited - so I must admit I am bringing a Leica Minilux as a backup. I will be posting the results in January at my photoblog, In the Footsteps of Joseph Rock.
I also thought about bringing my Leica IIIg but decided I didn't want to risk it in the mountains or in the guesthouses there ... if I lose the IIIa it's not TOO painful to replace. And maybe it's just my model, but the IIIa feels just a bit more solid than the IIIg.
The other advantage of using the IIIa is that I won't need to worry about batteries for it. The disadvantage is that the flash options are very limited - so I must admit I am bringing a Leica Minilux as a backup. I will be posting the results in January at my photoblog, In the Footsteps of Joseph Rock.