>That makes you one of my heroes then ...
>I'd appreciate it if you take a look at it
shadow --
I did run through your images in Flickr.
I have to say that most would not pass the first requirement for "street photography".
That requirement is -- to have people in the pictures.
And the photographer needs to be (very) close to these people -- at least some, if not most, of the time.
Then the picture needs to tell a story, or there needs to be a funny or odd juxaposition, or there needs to be some tension, or it needs to convey some emotion or mood.
Color, in my opinion, just doesn't lend itself to effective street photography. Some will disagree and there certainly has been some great work (far, far beyond my own) produced in color but I just think it is harder to achieve the above in color.
Also, again IMHO, America just isn't well suited for traditional street photography. Again, there are exceptions (Lee Friedlander) but I think our less crowded streets, our automobile culture, our homogenious glass and concrete cities, our multitude of Starbucks and McDonalds, are just flat out boring.
I sure that you noticed that all of mine street photos are from Europe. I try here but cannot find the inspiration that hits me just about every time I head out a door when I'm over there.
Dunno if this helps but photograph more people, go with b&w, get close (use a 50mm lens or shorter), and look for the unusual, and I think that your goal to become a better street photographer will improve immediately.