Ponsoldt
Established
Has anyone done a test to see if the coding is worth it? By test i mean take a picture with it and then without it and see if there is any difference?
Also, what level of success has everyone had with the sharpie coding? I tried it but I guess I got the spots in the wrong place.
Bill
PS Anyone who wants to see how bad the magenta cast is should take a shot of their black billingham bag, assuming they have one. Apparently, the M8 does not like he polyester material because its magenta. The leather sections remain black.
Also, what level of success has everyone had with the sharpie coding? I tried it but I guess I got the spots in the wrong place.
Bill
PS Anyone who wants to see how bad the magenta cast is should take a shot of their black billingham bag, assuming they have one. Apparently, the M8 does not like he polyester material because its magenta. The leather sections remain black.
cmogi10
Bodhisattva
Not sure about the coding but this is my favorite Magenta picture...

Mike Ip
Vagabond Light Collector
None of my lens are coded, nor do I plan on getting them coded. I haven't had any issues with non-coded lens.
sleeek
Member
Looks like a party. Liquor, bong, bag of weed, beer, camera and a bowl of cereal.cmogi10 said:Not sure about the coding but this is my favorite Magenta picture...
![]()
Ben Z
Veteran
I have IR filters on all my lenses, IMHO they are mandatory unless you want to tear your hair out in post processing, which I don't. All my lenses from 35mm and shorter are coded, which IMHO is mandatory for correcting the cyan corners unless you want to have to run every shot made with those focals through Cornerfix or PT Tools, which I don't. That all presumes you shoot in color. Maybe if all you shoot is in black and white you might not be upset by the IR thing.
However my total cost for coding seven lenses is.....zero, because I did it myself. Not with a magic marker either, I milled the slots for the black codes and filled them with auto touchup paint I happened to have. I didn't code any lenses 50mm or longer and don't plan on it. I don't care whether they are identified in EXIF. However because I leave "UV/IR" permanently "ON", one of my 50mm lenses had a screw which the code reader mistook for a code and it was a 90mm lens, so I put some white paint over the screw.
However my total cost for coding seven lenses is.....zero, because I did it myself. Not with a magic marker either, I milled the slots for the black codes and filled them with auto touchup paint I happened to have. I didn't code any lenses 50mm or longer and don't plan on it. I don't care whether they are identified in EXIF. However because I leave "UV/IR" permanently "ON", one of my 50mm lenses had a screw which the code reader mistook for a code and it was a 90mm lens, so I put some white paint over the screw.
Last edited:
kbg32
neo-romanticist
I use IR filters, but not all my lenses are coded.
bourgogneboy
Bourgogneboy
Does the coding have anything to do with the framing?
Does the coding have anything to do with the framing?
I find that the framing on my uncoded lenses is inaccurate. Would having them coded help?
Does the coding have anything to do with the framing?
I find that the framing on my uncoded lenses is inaccurate. Would having them coded help?
abumac
Well-known
I only have coded lenses wider than 35.
kbg32
neo-romanticist
bourgogneboy said:I find that the framing on my uncoded lenses is inaccurate. Would having them coded help?
The coding of the lenses has nothing to do with framing.
bottley1
only to feel
my snaps are boring and insipid, not to mention out-of-focus, over-exposed, and badly composed. Imagine how much worse they would be if the lenses were NOT coded? I shudder to think........
cmogi10
Bodhisattva
sleeek said:Looks like a party. Liquor, bong, bag of weed, beer, camera and a bowl of cereal.
Not my place! :angel:
POINT OF VIEW
Established
Shoot in Raw, coding is not necessary. I have one factory coded lens ( tri Elmar ). I cant see any difference with detection turned on in JPEG, Bill
infocusf8@earthlink.
Established
Coding? We don't need no stinking coding.
I suspect the importance of IR filters and lens coding depends on the use... Wedding & fashion photography obviously require this, but for landscapes or other uses in which black fabrics aren't an important element, then maybe it isn't necessary. Learn to love the occasional bit of magenta? 
Hacker
黑客
I have no choice but to use them on all my lenses. Because I take people shots, even grey synthetics and shots with people and foilage will appear off with the strong magenta cast. Imagine a $450 lens with a Leica $150 filter. Crazy.
rbrooks
Established
Coding costs have gone up at Leica. I sent mine in and they want something like 169 EUR just for the 6-bit. If you want it to focus on the M8 then there's more work they need to do so the cost goes up to 433 EUR for focus adj + 6-bit mount. Oh and add in the UV/IR filter to get the correct colors.
Ponsoldt
Established
Does any uv filter do the trick or do you have to buy a special Leica one?
bottley1
only to feel
I have Leica and B+W. Both the same in my opinion. I suspect B+W make the Leica ones???
bottley1
only to feel
.....but I have been wrong before!
baycrest
Established
I like coding my 35mm and wider lenses.
It provides the exif on the focal length of the lens used and "automatically" reduces vignetting. The first is kinda nice if you are accustomed to having that data on the DSLRs, the second you can compensate in post, with a few more key strokes.
"B+W 486 ir cut filters" are about half the price of the Leica counterparts
. If you are using Zeiss, CV or Rollei lenses, then you might not have a choice as Leica only produces filters in sizes that fit their lenses.
I used the 2 "free" Leica filters but have bought the more reasonably priced B+W otherwise. For my needs, I don't see any difference between the two. These filters are useful to get rid of the Magenta colours and seems to make other colours more accurate as well.
You can buy B+W online at places like Adorama, etc at reasonable prices.
Cheers,
Rob
It provides the exif on the focal length of the lens used and "automatically" reduces vignetting. The first is kinda nice if you are accustomed to having that data on the DSLRs, the second you can compensate in post, with a few more key strokes.
"B+W 486 ir cut filters" are about half the price of the Leica counterparts
I used the 2 "free" Leica filters but have bought the more reasonably priced B+W otherwise. For my needs, I don't see any difference between the two. These filters are useful to get rid of the Magenta colours and seems to make other colours more accurate as well.
You can buy B+W online at places like Adorama, etc at reasonable prices.
Cheers,
Rob
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.