Comparison

P

ppro

Guest
I have finished the first step (getting the gear in one place...) of doing a little comparison between a few cameras, all sold about the same time. I am curious to see how much difference can be seen just looking at the photos. I am sure it's been done but I just thought it would be an interesting exercise.

Here's what I'm thinking of comparing:


DSC03528.JPG
C3

  • 35mm Argus Sandmar f/4.5
  • 50mm Argus Cintar f/3.5
  • 100mm Argus Tele-Sandmar f/4.5
  • Argus Optical Viewfinder (Clip-On)
DSC04494.JPG
Geiss-Modified C4

  • 35mm Lithagon f/4.5
  • 50mm Argus Cintar f/2.8
  • 100mm Lithagon f/4.5
  • Geiss C4 Viewfinder
m3.gif
Leica M3

  • 35mm Summaron f/2.8
  • 50mm Summarit f/1.5
  • 90mm Elmar f/4.0
  • Nippon-Kogaku Multi-Focal variable finder (or integrated frame outlines)
And as further insult to injury, I might make an (unfair?) comparison with (gasp):

DSC03491.JPG
Pentax Spotmatic

  • Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 35mm f/3.5
  • Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 55mm f/2.0
  • Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 105mm f/2.8
My thinking is that these are comparable focal-length lenses being aimed with their companion viewfinders on rangefinder equipped, 35mm bodies. Naturally, all shots would be done with all variables matched (f-stop, indicated shutter speed, camera angle to subject, use of hoods, cable release, etc.) This is not a test to count molecules of grain, lines-per-inch, etc., just a comparison of practical results and perhaps some observations about ease of use...

Don't expect to see the results soon. Life is full and shooting will take a while.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks Steve, good to know there's others here that have diverse interests. I held back from putting up the Spotmatic "team" shot because it would be more or less off-topic... Gotta hang a bit here before I go do something like that... 🙂
 
Back
Top Bottom