caila77
Well-known
Mazurka
Well-known
There are clearly not the same -- just similar.
For the record, it was Zeiss who invented the Biogon, double-Gauss and Sonnar formulae which have been copied and modified by every camera-lens maker, Leitz/Leica included.
For the record, it was Zeiss who invented the Biogon, double-Gauss and Sonnar formulae which have been copied and modified by every camera-lens maker, Leitz/Leica included.
caila77
Well-known
Mazurka said:There are clearly not the same -- just similar.![]()
For the record, it was Zeiss who invented the Biogon, double-Gauss and Sonnar formulae which have been copied and modified by every camera-lens maker, Leitz/Leica included.
that's right I have to write VERY SIMILAR
Robert Price
I missed what?
Due to there Similarities, that is why a G2 Lenses are such good lenses.
caila77
Well-known
Robert Price said:Due to there Similarities, that is why a G2 Lenses are such good lenses.
that's exactlywhat I want do say!
ferider
Veteran
caila77 said:that's right I have to write VERY SIMILAR
Check out the Canon 35/2 and 50/1.4 and their similarities to the Leitz 35 Summicron and 50 Summilux (and were designed earlier).
See, for instance
http://www.taunusreiter.de/Cameras/Canon_RF_2.html
BTW, you only show one variant of the 35/2. Others have 6 or 8 elements.
Roland.
Last edited:
caila77
Well-known
ferider said:Check out the Canon 35/2 and 50/1.4 and their similarities to the Leitz 35 Summicron and 50 Summilux (and were designed earlier).
See, for instance
http://www.taunusreiter.de/Cameras/Canon_RF_2.html
BTW, you only show one variant of the 35/2. Others have 6 or 8 elements.
Roland.
thanks I know, both are gauss design if I remember correctly.
Share: