ferider
Veteran
Welcome to this critique thread. Please read the purpose statement and the guidelines/ground rules regarding participation.
Purpose
The primary purpose of this thread is to provide a forum where photographers can give and receive constructive criticism on one another's photographs. By setting up some basic guidelines we hope that this thread will provide a forum where the give and take of honest constructive criticism can help us become better photographers.
Guidelines/Ground Rules
The thread has very specific rules regarding participation. The one basic rule is that you cannot provide criticism on an image or comment in a critique thread unless you also have an image posted. To post an image to this thread you must be a participant. Participation in this thread is limited. Here are the guidelines and ground rules for participation:
• Participation in this thread is limited to 5 photographers
• Participants join the thread by posting their intention. You can simply reply with your intent to join by posting something like: "I'm joining," "I'm in," or just state your name
• Joining is on a "first come, first served" basis. The first 5 to reply become the participants.
• Please, only join this thread if you are able post an image within 24 hours of joining.
• Once the thread has 5 participants, no other photographers can join or participate in the thread
• Once the thread is full of participants all photographers will upload their image(s)
• Please abide by any thematic requirement (e.g., landscape, portrait, etc.)
•The number of photos for each participant is limited to one
• Photographers attach photos as thumbnails (no inline images or links)
• Photos should be standard screen resolution (72~90) and the longest side of the image approximately 10 inches in length.
NOTE: New size limitations restrict attachment sizes to 300kb for jpegs. If you need help sizing your image for the web see THIS pdf.
• Photographers post their images supplying titles (if any) and other pertinent information (the amount of information should be minimal)
• Photographers can only comment on their own images and reply to comments only when everyone else in the thread has posted their comments on the image
• Every participant must comment on every photo (except their own—initially)
• Every participant must make at least two comments, one positive comment, and one constructive criticism.
• Once every photographer has commented then a free flowing discussion begins. It is at this point that every photographer can comment on their own work and reply to comments, ask questions, etc.
• The participants decide when the thread closes.
What's a Guest?
A guest is a participating member of the thread who does not need to post a picture. The guest is an exception to the guideline that states all participants must post an image. Guests provide criticism just as the other participants do. Guests are also encouraged to act as moderators, to encourage elaboration, to guide discussion and examine latent concepts brought about as a result of the discussion.
Note: Not all threads will have a guest. See the title/subject line for the '+Guest' designation.
Some Resources
If you'd like to participate in a critique thread and need some ideas about how to proceed with viewing images critically, you may find this thread helpful:
How do you look at photos
You can also provide feedback on critique threads here:
Critique Feedback Thread
If you need help sizing your image for the web see:
dcsang's pdf
Remember: Please do not provide criticism on an image or comment in a critique thread unless you also have an image posted.
This thread is now active, please follow the guidelines if you'd like to participate! Have Fun!
Purpose
The primary purpose of this thread is to provide a forum where photographers can give and receive constructive criticism on one another's photographs. By setting up some basic guidelines we hope that this thread will provide a forum where the give and take of honest constructive criticism can help us become better photographers.
Guidelines/Ground Rules
The thread has very specific rules regarding participation. The one basic rule is that you cannot provide criticism on an image or comment in a critique thread unless you also have an image posted. To post an image to this thread you must be a participant. Participation in this thread is limited. Here are the guidelines and ground rules for participation:
• Participation in this thread is limited to 5 photographers
• Participants join the thread by posting their intention. You can simply reply with your intent to join by posting something like: "I'm joining," "I'm in," or just state your name
• Joining is on a "first come, first served" basis. The first 5 to reply become the participants.
• Please, only join this thread if you are able post an image within 24 hours of joining.
• Once the thread has 5 participants, no other photographers can join or participate in the thread
• Once the thread is full of participants all photographers will upload their image(s)
• Please abide by any thematic requirement (e.g., landscape, portrait, etc.)
•The number of photos for each participant is limited to one
• Photographers attach photos as thumbnails (no inline images or links)
• Photos should be standard screen resolution (72~90) and the longest side of the image approximately 10 inches in length.
NOTE: New size limitations restrict attachment sizes to 300kb for jpegs. If you need help sizing your image for the web see THIS pdf.
• Photographers post their images supplying titles (if any) and other pertinent information (the amount of information should be minimal)
• Photographers can only comment on their own images and reply to comments only when everyone else in the thread has posted their comments on the image
• Every participant must comment on every photo (except their own—initially)
• Every participant must make at least two comments, one positive comment, and one constructive criticism.
• Once every photographer has commented then a free flowing discussion begins. It is at this point that every photographer can comment on their own work and reply to comments, ask questions, etc.
• The participants decide when the thread closes.
What's a Guest?
A guest is a participating member of the thread who does not need to post a picture. The guest is an exception to the guideline that states all participants must post an image. Guests provide criticism just as the other participants do. Guests are also encouraged to act as moderators, to encourage elaboration, to guide discussion and examine latent concepts brought about as a result of the discussion.
Note: Not all threads will have a guest. See the title/subject line for the '+Guest' designation.
Some Resources
If you'd like to participate in a critique thread and need some ideas about how to proceed with viewing images critically, you may find this thread helpful:
How do you look at photos
You can also provide feedback on critique threads here:
Critique Feedback Thread
If you need help sizing your image for the web see:
dcsang's pdf
Remember: Please do not provide criticism on an image or comment in a critique thread unless you also have an image posted.
This thread is now active, please follow the guidelines if you'd like to participate! Have Fun!
infrequent
Well-known
in for sure.
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
i'm in!!
.
.
sbug
Acceptably Sharp
Wahoo! In. 
Bingley
Veteran
I'm in, w/ fear and trepidation.
pellothed1
Member
I'm in it.
infrequent
Well-known
pellothed1
Member
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
Bingley
Veteran
Attachments
sbug
Acceptably Sharp
sbug
Acceptably Sharp
Infrequent:
Well, it’s color for starters. That’s a refreshing change from the expected black and white street photography. I’ve tried color myself a couple of times but never seem pleased with the results. I think the boldness of color works in this shot.
I’m not sure what the image conveys though. Maybe that these are some funky shoes deserving of attention? Hmm…
Pellothed1:
Good shot of an interesting looking fellow. I really love the swirls/curls of the pavers.
I wish there was a bit more going on in the photo though. Maybe if he wasn’t centered there would be something interesting of to the side? Of course, not being there, I really don’t know.
Ray:
Nice tones. This has a real classic feel to it which you seem to be good at. I really like the reflection and shadow of the woman and the peek into the doorway on the right is interesting to.
If I could meddle with reality, I’d remove the bit of car that doesn’t fit the image at all, and I’d have the woman walking into the frame, rather than out. Maybe she could have her head turned towards the window so that you could only see her face as a reflection.
Bingley:
Lots to look at here. All four people have interesting expressions and I particularly like the boy with the long hair, left of center. I’d like to know what each of them is looking at. Love the VILLANS sign too.
I think my only suggestion would be to have stepped back ever so slightly or shot with a lens that was just a bit wider. If this was shot with a 35, I think a 28 could be better. I’d like just a little bit more room on the sides and missing the top of the bald guy’s head bothers me.
Well, it’s color for starters. That’s a refreshing change from the expected black and white street photography. I’ve tried color myself a couple of times but never seem pleased with the results. I think the boldness of color works in this shot.
I’m not sure what the image conveys though. Maybe that these are some funky shoes deserving of attention? Hmm…
Pellothed1:
Good shot of an interesting looking fellow. I really love the swirls/curls of the pavers.
I wish there was a bit more going on in the photo though. Maybe if he wasn’t centered there would be something interesting of to the side? Of course, not being there, I really don’t know.
Ray:
Nice tones. This has a real classic feel to it which you seem to be good at. I really like the reflection and shadow of the woman and the peek into the doorway on the right is interesting to.
If I could meddle with reality, I’d remove the bit of car that doesn’t fit the image at all, and I’d have the woman walking into the frame, rather than out. Maybe she could have her head turned towards the window so that you could only see her face as a reflection.
Bingley:
Lots to look at here. All four people have interesting expressions and I particularly like the boy with the long hair, left of center. I’d like to know what each of them is looking at. Love the VILLANS sign too.
I think my only suggestion would be to have stepped back ever so slightly or shot with a lens that was just a bit wider. If this was shot with a 35, I think a 28 could be better. I’d like just a little bit more room on the sides and missing the top of the bald guy’s head bothers me.
pellothed1
Member
Ok I'll go.
infrequent - My eye is immediately drawn to the shoes, which was obviously your intent, learning to lead the eye of the viewer with color and DOF is really important. But as a street photograph this looks more like a product shot. I think that this shot would have been completely unsuccessful in black and white, but the way you've done it at least grabs the viewers attention. If you want to do street photography along these lines, look at William Eggleston or Stephen Shore's work. Here's where things get a little personal (strictly opinion). I don't like street photography with narrow DOF. I think it lends a softness to the scene that is more suitable to portrait photography than the real world. I'm not sure who said it, but one of the famous photographers said that he used black and white film because when you look at color pictures, you notice clothes, when you look at a black and white picture you look at faces. This picture seems to fit that bill exactly, I'm not sure if you intentionally did that or not. But overall, I'm in the same mindset of Scott, I'm just not sure of your intentions and can't help but wonder if this isn't directly removed from a series of shots.
RayPa - My eye is immediately drawn to the open doorway, away from the girl, it takes a minute or two of looking over the whole picture to take it in. This is something I look for in my own pictures...not being able to sum them up immediately. I would personally like to see more people in this type of shot or none at all, while the girl and the window is great, she's so far away that we can't really see her, sometimes this works and sometimes it doesn't. I think without her the picture would look more surreal.
Bingley - That looks like Joel Meyerowitz in the picture. This picture took a minute to examine. I personally tend to really like photos with some sort of strange action or gesture, or something really simple. The kid on the left with his mouth open really made it for me. I only wish he was within the DOF of your lens. This is something I'm picky about. I just prefer to see everything in focus in a picture (as much as possible), I realize the Meyerowitz look-a-like is probably too close even if this was shot at f16. I like that you've used the signage in the background to apply to those two in the foreground, villains or not, you've made them into that by taking the picture at that point in time. I think this is an interesting photo. The only "problem" per se, that I have with it, is I really wish it had more DOF and a little wider.
sbug - Everyone seems to be looking at the guy in the center, which is thought prevoking. It makes the viewer wonder why, has he done something wrong, did he just yell, because the girl at the top of the photo carrying the box looks to be turning to see him as well, maybe he's yelling at her. It's interesting that we can ask all these questions, but the picture can't tell us any answers. I usually really dislike photos taken from above and there seem to be alot of them on RFF and Pnet because I think they are a cop-out, but I think this one really works because the people in the periphery. They make us ask the questions. As for critiques I really have none, this is about the best of this type of picture that I've seen.
infrequent - My eye is immediately drawn to the shoes, which was obviously your intent, learning to lead the eye of the viewer with color and DOF is really important. But as a street photograph this looks more like a product shot. I think that this shot would have been completely unsuccessful in black and white, but the way you've done it at least grabs the viewers attention. If you want to do street photography along these lines, look at William Eggleston or Stephen Shore's work. Here's where things get a little personal (strictly opinion). I don't like street photography with narrow DOF. I think it lends a softness to the scene that is more suitable to portrait photography than the real world. I'm not sure who said it, but one of the famous photographers said that he used black and white film because when you look at color pictures, you notice clothes, when you look at a black and white picture you look at faces. This picture seems to fit that bill exactly, I'm not sure if you intentionally did that or not. But overall, I'm in the same mindset of Scott, I'm just not sure of your intentions and can't help but wonder if this isn't directly removed from a series of shots.
RayPa - My eye is immediately drawn to the open doorway, away from the girl, it takes a minute or two of looking over the whole picture to take it in. This is something I look for in my own pictures...not being able to sum them up immediately. I would personally like to see more people in this type of shot or none at all, while the girl and the window is great, she's so far away that we can't really see her, sometimes this works and sometimes it doesn't. I think without her the picture would look more surreal.
Bingley - That looks like Joel Meyerowitz in the picture. This picture took a minute to examine. I personally tend to really like photos with some sort of strange action or gesture, or something really simple. The kid on the left with his mouth open really made it for me. I only wish he was within the DOF of your lens. This is something I'm picky about. I just prefer to see everything in focus in a picture (as much as possible), I realize the Meyerowitz look-a-like is probably too close even if this was shot at f16. I like that you've used the signage in the background to apply to those two in the foreground, villains or not, you've made them into that by taking the picture at that point in time. I think this is an interesting photo. The only "problem" per se, that I have with it, is I really wish it had more DOF and a little wider.
sbug - Everyone seems to be looking at the guy in the center, which is thought prevoking. It makes the viewer wonder why, has he done something wrong, did he just yell, because the girl at the top of the photo carrying the box looks to be turning to see him as well, maybe he's yelling at her. It's interesting that we can ask all these questions, but the picture can't tell us any answers. I usually really dislike photos taken from above and there seem to be alot of them on RFF and Pnet because I think they are a cop-out, but I think this one really works because the people in the periphery. They make us ask the questions. As for critiques I really have none, this is about the best of this type of picture that I've seen.
Last edited:
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
infrequent -- while probably not "technically" a street photo, the good thing about the genre is that it is wide-open. + This is a beautiful image to look at. The color is refreshing, as is the subtle use of DoF. It makes the front shoe pop out. At first look, the image could be viewed simply as a "fashion" photo, but I really like the little scuff on the heel and the slight wear on the shoe. It gives the image the impromptu unplanned snapshot/street feel. It also provides a little bit of the hallmark twist you sometimes find in street photography. -- However, it would have been nice to have seen a little more, a little more of the depth that you find by providing more context. I know that's tough when photographing shoes, and you can tell a lot by the shoes someone wears. The little bit of information that image provides tells me that she is most likely caucasion and is wearing "new" jeans and "new" nice shoes. It's the wear, the little scuff, that has me wanting to know more.
pellothed -- Tony, + this is an interesting image, one that feels like it belongs to a set of images. it reminds me of Koudelka (I hope you don't mind me referencing other photographers. It's a good thing, btw!). This is obviously a public place. I'm not sure of the relation of the person in the image to the place. At first, I thought that he might be a worker. He seems at home or familiar with the location. His glance into the camera seems a little aggressive or cocky. I don't mind the central placement of the figure (this is why it reminds of Koudelka--he's the master of it). It's a confident gesture by the photographer that adds prominence to the subject. The subject seems up to it!! -- not much on the negative side. I'd like to know/see more (back story?/caption?), particularly if this is part of set of images. the partial figure on the left edge and the shadows are a bit distracting. This is a good image that shows the confidence of the photographer shooting on the street. Good job.
bingley - Steve, + this is really an up-front, in your face street shot. I really like the arrangement of the people in the image. My focus goes to the younger individual with the long hair. I think the focus is sharpest on this individual. I also begin to wonder about the relationship between this individual and the bald-headed man. They seem to be a pair. The placement of both and their off screen glance originally made me think that they are engaged in some discussion, something of prominence, but the gesture of the man, holding his coat makes me think that they are just passing by. But still your closeness to the whole scene is where I find this image's power. The kid in the background, the woman on the right, and the Villan sign add nicely to the street "feel" of the image. -- my only issue with the image is a lack of DoF. I think for street shooting, you have to stop-down in order to get as much information as possible. Having that kid in the background in sharp focus would have really added a lot to this already really good street photo. nice work.
sbug -- Scott this is really good street shot. + It's less a PJ style photograph and more a stylistic photograph that works all the elements into the whole image. It's the type of photo that always elicits the standard "great catch" comment. It is a well-seen and well-caught moment. There's nice balance and sense of space. There's a strong sense of something happening, especially with the crowd of folks in the top left. They appear to be watching this one individual (who reads to be a photographer with his man-purse!). This could all be a fiction, but that's one of the things that makes good a street photo, working meaning and structure from the real-time real-world as it's happening. -- about the only thing I would add here is that there is a little bit of looseness in the image on the left, right, and bottom. I'm not sure how you stand on cropping, but keeping the aspect ration and trimming these edges would tighten up the composition. It's a great shot! Great catch!
Great street shots here. Thanks for sharing everyone.
.
pellothed -- Tony, + this is an interesting image, one that feels like it belongs to a set of images. it reminds me of Koudelka (I hope you don't mind me referencing other photographers. It's a good thing, btw!). This is obviously a public place. I'm not sure of the relation of the person in the image to the place. At first, I thought that he might be a worker. He seems at home or familiar with the location. His glance into the camera seems a little aggressive or cocky. I don't mind the central placement of the figure (this is why it reminds of Koudelka--he's the master of it). It's a confident gesture by the photographer that adds prominence to the subject. The subject seems up to it!! -- not much on the negative side. I'd like to know/see more (back story?/caption?), particularly if this is part of set of images. the partial figure on the left edge and the shadows are a bit distracting. This is a good image that shows the confidence of the photographer shooting on the street. Good job.
bingley - Steve, + this is really an up-front, in your face street shot. I really like the arrangement of the people in the image. My focus goes to the younger individual with the long hair. I think the focus is sharpest on this individual. I also begin to wonder about the relationship between this individual and the bald-headed man. They seem to be a pair. The placement of both and their off screen glance originally made me think that they are engaged in some discussion, something of prominence, but the gesture of the man, holding his coat makes me think that they are just passing by. But still your closeness to the whole scene is where I find this image's power. The kid in the background, the woman on the right, and the Villan sign add nicely to the street "feel" of the image. -- my only issue with the image is a lack of DoF. I think for street shooting, you have to stop-down in order to get as much information as possible. Having that kid in the background in sharp focus would have really added a lot to this already really good street photo. nice work.
sbug -- Scott this is really good street shot. + It's less a PJ style photograph and more a stylistic photograph that works all the elements into the whole image. It's the type of photo that always elicits the standard "great catch" comment. It is a well-seen and well-caught moment. There's nice balance and sense of space. There's a strong sense of something happening, especially with the crowd of folks in the top left. They appear to be watching this one individual (who reads to be a photographer with his man-purse!). This could all be a fiction, but that's one of the things that makes good a street photo, working meaning and structure from the real-time real-world as it's happening. -- about the only thing I would add here is that there is a little bit of looseness in the image on the left, right, and bottom. I'm not sure how you stand on cropping, but keeping the aspect ration and trimming these edges would tighten up the composition. It's a great shot! Great catch!
Great street shots here. Thanks for sharing everyone.
.
Last edited:
Bingley
Veteran
Taken together, the four photos I'm commenting on present a really interesting commentary on what street photograph is these days. This is my first participation in this kind of a thread here, so I'm going to keep my remarks brief, but I enjoyed looking at and thinking about what each photography was attempting to convey. I have purposely NOT read any of the comments by others before writing mine:
Infrequent: I love the color on the shoes. The green just pops out. The shot presents an interesting contrast between the formality of the shoes and the informality of the jeans that the subject is wearing. The pose suggests an attitude, but I'm not quite sure what kind of attitude. Perhaps this is a commentary on how little of a person must be in a scene to make it a "street photograph." Alternatively, one might view the image as a kind of still life. Really nice contrast, too, between the in focus and out of focus shoes.
This is a picture that might be stronger if it were juxtaposed with other images of similar character or attitude, or made part of a set (I know these aren't the rules for this thread, though). Also, I think it might be interesting to seek out a scene involving more than one pair of legs/feet/shoes, a scene that might suggest a conversation going on but conveyed as a reflection of body language literally at street level.
pellothed1: I am not a bw expert by any means, but this shot strikes me as excellent in terms of exposure, focus, tones. The subject appears to be walking through a public place, but no one else is there. He does not appear to be making eye contact w/ the photographer either, but glancing off to the left instead. What does he see? Another person, or object? There's an element of mystery here which is fascinating.
I wonder whether cropping along the left side, to eliminate what might be a foot as well as the figure in the booth, might accentuate the isolation of the subject in a public space. Also, did you make any other images of this figure, either w/ eye contact or w/ other people? Finally, I'm not sure that centering the figure works for me. It draws attention to the figure, but raises a question in my mind about what you're trying to convey regarding the relationship of the figure to the space around him. Still, I like this shot a lot.
RayPa: I think this is a really lovely exposure, w/ sharpness and a kind of glow from the gray stone of the building while capturing its texture. The reflection in the window appears to be balanced by the figure on the left and the open door on the right. The reflected image appears as a kind trailing image to the figure who is leaving the scene (did she walk out the open door and down the street?), but you've more or less centered the reflected image in the scene. Interesting!
Placing the reflected image more towards the center of the scene, however, introduces a tension w/ the figure on the far left that I'm still wondering about. I thought about what a crop would look like that removed the figure and just left the reflection, but I'm not sure that improves the image any. The only thing that I find problematic w/ this image is the rear of the car in the lower left corner: I think this might have been an even more interesting picture if your position had been a little closer to facing the window, and if you had captured the figure as she walked by a moment earlier in time. But street photography (to me, at least) is at least partly about making the best of a fleeting scene, and I certainly like what you've done here.
sbug: Now this is an interesting take on "street photography"! The Lone Ranger strides down the middle of an (almost) empty Bourbon Street, while a crowd of casually dressed onlookers watches from a sidestreet. The two figures in the upper right appear to carry cue cards, suggesting that this is a film or t.v. shoot. Regardless, the placement of figures is really interesting, particularly the space between the man in the hat and the small crowd. Also, technically speaking, this is excellent.
I'm not sure what I would have done differently here, or what you might change. Perhaps a crop along the bottom and the right side would emphasize the relationship of the three "sets" of figures (the lone man w/ hat, the crowd, and the two men w/ cue cards), although you'd obviously lose some of the sense of isolation of the man w/ the hat from the other figures. I just find this a really interesting shot.
OK, enough ramblings from me. This is all great work!
Infrequent: I love the color on the shoes. The green just pops out. The shot presents an interesting contrast between the formality of the shoes and the informality of the jeans that the subject is wearing. The pose suggests an attitude, but I'm not quite sure what kind of attitude. Perhaps this is a commentary on how little of a person must be in a scene to make it a "street photograph." Alternatively, one might view the image as a kind of still life. Really nice contrast, too, between the in focus and out of focus shoes.
This is a picture that might be stronger if it were juxtaposed with other images of similar character or attitude, or made part of a set (I know these aren't the rules for this thread, though). Also, I think it might be interesting to seek out a scene involving more than one pair of legs/feet/shoes, a scene that might suggest a conversation going on but conveyed as a reflection of body language literally at street level.
pellothed1: I am not a bw expert by any means, but this shot strikes me as excellent in terms of exposure, focus, tones. The subject appears to be walking through a public place, but no one else is there. He does not appear to be making eye contact w/ the photographer either, but glancing off to the left instead. What does he see? Another person, or object? There's an element of mystery here which is fascinating.
I wonder whether cropping along the left side, to eliminate what might be a foot as well as the figure in the booth, might accentuate the isolation of the subject in a public space. Also, did you make any other images of this figure, either w/ eye contact or w/ other people? Finally, I'm not sure that centering the figure works for me. It draws attention to the figure, but raises a question in my mind about what you're trying to convey regarding the relationship of the figure to the space around him. Still, I like this shot a lot.
RayPa: I think this is a really lovely exposure, w/ sharpness and a kind of glow from the gray stone of the building while capturing its texture. The reflection in the window appears to be balanced by the figure on the left and the open door on the right. The reflected image appears as a kind trailing image to the figure who is leaving the scene (did she walk out the open door and down the street?), but you've more or less centered the reflected image in the scene. Interesting!
Placing the reflected image more towards the center of the scene, however, introduces a tension w/ the figure on the far left that I'm still wondering about. I thought about what a crop would look like that removed the figure and just left the reflection, but I'm not sure that improves the image any. The only thing that I find problematic w/ this image is the rear of the car in the lower left corner: I think this might have been an even more interesting picture if your position had been a little closer to facing the window, and if you had captured the figure as she walked by a moment earlier in time. But street photography (to me, at least) is at least partly about making the best of a fleeting scene, and I certainly like what you've done here.
sbug: Now this is an interesting take on "street photography"! The Lone Ranger strides down the middle of an (almost) empty Bourbon Street, while a crowd of casually dressed onlookers watches from a sidestreet. The two figures in the upper right appear to carry cue cards, suggesting that this is a film or t.v. shoot. Regardless, the placement of figures is really interesting, particularly the space between the man in the hat and the small crowd. Also, technically speaking, this is excellent.
I'm not sure what I would have done differently here, or what you might change. Perhaps a crop along the bottom and the right side would emphasize the relationship of the three "sets" of figures (the lone man w/ hat, the crowd, and the two men w/ cue cards), although you'd obviously lose some of the sense of isolation of the man w/ the hat from the other figures. I just find this a really interesting shot.
OK, enough ramblings from me. This is all great work!
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
Let me add my twopence just to say that everybody did a great job; good to see the true spirit of photo critique; the commitment was already evident by the entries.
Two thumbs up.
Two thumbs up.
ferider
Veteran
Gabriel M.A. said:
I second that. Thanks very much, everybody. It would be nice if
one of the participants in this thread (Ray excluded, he has started so
many of these threads) would start the next critique thread. Or you
Gabriel
Technically it's easy: quote the first post, remove the html quote marks,
copy what you have in your editor, and paste into a new thread labeled
appropriately.
Thanks again,
Roland.
Last edited:
Bingley
Veteran
I think we're missing a commentary/critique from Infrequent.
Also, after Infrequent weighs in, I hope each of us will post a response to the comments on his/her contribution.
Also, after Infrequent weighs in, I hope each of us will post a response to the comments on his/her contribution.